期刊文献+

预压法处理软土地基工后沉降预测分析 被引量:2

Prediction of post construction settlement of soft soil foundation treated by preloading method
下载PDF
导出
摘要 根据现场实测沉降曲线计算总沉降和工后沉降的方法有多种,但计算结果差异较大,多年工程经验表明,双曲线法计算的沉降量值普遍大于其他方法计算的沉降量值。本文结合一个工程实例,分析了常规方法计算总沉降量时差异较大的原因,并通过建立数值模型模拟分析软土地基的沉降发展过程。 There are many kinds of method to calculate the total settlement and post construction settlement based on the field measured settlement curve. However the results are quite different. Years of engineering experience shows that the settlement value calculated by hyperbolic method is generally greater than other methods. In this paper, an engineering example is given to analyze the reasons for the large difference in the total settlement calculated by the conventional method. The settlement development of soft soil foundation is analyzed by numerical simulation.
出处 《江苏水利》 2017年第5期24-28,共5页 Jiangsu Water Resources
关键词 真空联合堆载预压 工后沉降 双曲线法 弹塑性模型 vacuum combined surcharge preloading post construction settlement hyperbolic method elasticplastic model
  • 相关文献

参考文献6

二级参考文献38

共引文献136

同被引文献12

引证文献2

二级引证文献12

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部