期刊文献+

BI-RADS评级标准联合超声弹性成像评分对乳腺肿块良恶性鉴别诊断的价值 被引量:29

BI-RADS rating criteria combined with ultrasound elastography score for differential diagnosis of benign and malignant breast tumors value
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:分析乳腺影像学报告及数据系统(BI-RADS)评级标准联合超声弹性成像(UE)评分对乳腺肿块良恶性鉴别诊断的价值。方法:对247例(306个肿块)乳腺肿块患者(良性243个,恶性63个)分别进行BI-RADS评级及UE检查评分并经手术组织病理证实,分析BI-RADS评级标准联合UE评分对乳腺肿块良恶性鉴别诊断价值。结果:BI-RADS评级法标准ROC曲线下面积(AUC)0.739,UE改良5分法AUC 0.847,二者之间差异有统计学意义(P<0.001)。2种方法结合后AUC为0.938,与2种诊断方法分别构建的ROC进行比较,之间的差异均具有统计学意义(P<0.01)。结论:BI-RADS评级标准联合UE评分对乳腺肿块良恶性鉴别诊断具有较高价值。
出处 《中国临床医学影像杂志》 CAS 2014年第4期277-279,共3页 Journal of China Clinic Medical Imaging
  • 相关文献

参考文献1

二级参考文献8

  • 1欧冰,罗葆明,冯霞,杨海云,文艳玲,智慧,马健鸿.超声弹性成像与钼靶X线成像诊断乳腺疾病的对照研究[J].中华医学超声杂志(电子版),2006,3(4):240-241. 被引量:8
  • 2罗葆明,欧冰,冯霞,周敏,文艳玲.乳腺疾病实时组织弹性成像与病理对照的初步探讨[J].中国超声医学杂志,2005,21(9):662-664. 被引量:207
  • 3罗葆明,欧冰,冯霞,文艳玲,智慧.乳腺疾病实时组织弹性成像与彩色多普勒超声的对照研究[J].中华医学超声杂志(电子版),2005,2(5):265-267. 被引量:31
  • 4Itoh A,Ueno E,Tohno E,et al.Comparison between ultrasonic elastogram and histologic findings in breast diseases.Seventh Congress of Asian Federation of Societies for Ultrasound in Medicine and Biology (AFSUMB 2004),Abstracts,330.
  • 5Itoh A,Ueno E,Tohno E,et al.Breast disease:clinical application of US elastography for diagnosis.Radiology,2006,239:341-350.
  • 6Khalil AS,Chan RC,Chau AH,et al.Tissue elasticity estimation with optical coherence elastography:toward mechanical characterization of in vivo soft tissue.Ann Biomed Eng,2005,33:1631-1639.
  • 7Han L,Noble JA,Burcher M.A novel ultrasound indentation system for measuring biomechanical properties of in vivo soft tissue.Ultrasound Med Biol,2003,29:813-823.
  • 8Krouskop TA,Wheeler TM,Kallel F,et al.Elastic moduli of breast and prostate tissues under compression.Ultrason Imaging,1998,20:260-274.

共引文献369

同被引文献221

  • 1黄慧.超声弹性成像与BI-RADS-US分级在诊断乳腺肿块中的应用价值[J].医学信息(医学与计算机应用),2014,0(20):202-203. 被引量:3
  • 2范会文,黄盱宁,吴少芬.BI-RADS-US诊断标准与超声弹性成像应变率比值法在乳腺良恶性肿块中的诊断价值[J].中国老年学杂志,2014,34(11):2998-2999. 被引量:13
  • 3张保宁.乳腺癌临床研究的回顾与展望[J].中华医学杂志,2005,85(1):7-8. 被引量:47
  • 4罗葆明,欧冰,智慧,曾婕,杨海云.改良超声弹性成像评分标准在乳腺肿块鉴别诊断中的价值[J].现代临床医学生物工程学杂志,2006,12(5):396-398. 被引量:370
  • 5Elverici E, Zengin B, Nurdan Barca A, et al. Interobserver andIntraobserver Agreement of Sonographic BIRADS Lexicon in theAssessment of Breast Masses[ J]. Iran J Radiol,2013,10(3) : 122-127.
  • 6Kim S M, Han H, Park } M, et al. A comparison of logisticregression analysis and an artificial neural network using the BI-RADS lexicon for ultrasonography in conjunction with introbservervariability [ J]. J Digit Imaging,2012,25(5) :599-606.
  • 7Aho M, Irshad A, Ackerman S al. Correlation of sonographicfeatures of invasive ductal mammary carcinoma with age, tumorgrade, and hormone-receptor status [ J ]. J Clin Ultrasound ,2013,41(1):10-17.
  • 8Cho H C, Hadjiiski L, Sahiner B, et al. Similarity evaluation inacontent-based image retrieval ( CBIR ) CADx system forcharacterization of breast masses on ultrasound images [ J ]. MedPhys,2011,38(4) :1820-1831.
  • 9Evans A, Whelehan P, Thomson K, et al. Differentiatingbenignfrom malignant solid breast masses : Value of shear waveelastography according to lesion stiffness combined with greyscaleultrasound according to BI-RADS classification [ J ]. Br J Cancer,2012,107(2) :224-229.
  • 10Caproni N, Marchisio F, Pecchi A, et al. Contrast-enhancedultrasound in the characterization of breast masses : Utility ofquantitative analysis in comparison with MRI[ J]. Eur Radiol,2010,20(6):1384-1395.

引证文献29

二级引证文献235

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部