《龙龛手镜》疑难字形音义札考四则

Four Items of Supplementary Notes to Debatable and Difficult Characters,Phonetic Notations and Interpretations of“Long kan Shoujing(《龙龛手镜》)”

《龙龛手镜·杂部》'■'字诸家未释,今考当为《说文》'丘'的古文'■'的楷写讹变字;《杂部》'■'字,《中华字海》注音为'jùn'不当,当有xìn、xùn两读,学者尚未指出'■'的今文还可能是'讯'字;《杂部》'[■],古文,音祭'条中'祭'疑当为'癸'之误;《石部·平声》的'■'字,《汉语大字典》注音为chěn,不当,当音jī,今通行字实为'■',其古文'■'实当为'■'字之误,'■'乃'磣'的异写字,而《石部·上声》列为'磣'的古文的'■'字则当为'■'字之误。

It is the first time to be mentioned in this article that the character "(?)(qiu)" in"Zabu"(《杂部》)of "Longkan Shoujing(《龙龛手镜》)"should be an erroneous transformation of the ancient Chinese character form "(?)(qiu)"of"Shuowen(《说文》)"and which is written as"丘(qiu)"now; The phonetic notation of the character "(?)"in"Zabu"should be "xìn" or"xùn"which has been wrongly noted as "jùn"by "Zhonghua Zihai(《中华字海》)",and no any other scholar has recognized that the character"(?)" maybe had been used to refer to the word"xun"(讯).The word "ji"(祭)in the notations attached to the character"(?)"should be a typographical error of"gui"(癸);The phonetic notation of the character"(?)"in "Pingsheng"(《平声》)of"Shibu"(《石部》)should be "jī" which has been wrongly noted as"chěn"by"Hanyu Da Zidian"(《汉语大字典》),whose current word form is"(?)"(ji),and the ancient character"(?)"(ji)attached to"(?)"(ji) should be wrriten as"(?)"(ji),"(?)"should be a variant character of "磣"(chen) and the ancient character "(?)" in " Shangsheng"(《上声》)of"Shibu" attached to"chen"(磣) should be a typographical error of"chen"((?)).