摘要
法藏敦煌汉文写卷P.2063以草书抄录了唐代大德净眼的两种因明论著。本文围绕草书字形,结合上下文意,比较佛经异文,依据高清图版,从误认草书、忽略校正文字或符号两方面对前人录文中尚存之问题进行校补。
The Dunhuang manuscript P.2063 records the great Buddhist priest JingYan’s(净眼)two articles about Hetu-Vidya in cursive handwriting.This paper centers on cursive characters,pays attention to the context,compares variant texts,according to high definition pictures to revise the former interpretations’left problems in the aspect of both mistaking cursive characters and ignoring correcting characters and signs.
关键词
敦煌写本文献
草书
《因明入正理论略抄》
《因明入正理论后疏》
Dunhuang Manuscripts
Cursive Writing
The Brief Transcription of Nyāyapravesatākasāstra
The Rear Commentaries of Nyāyapravesatākasāstra