摘要
在“曹评”史上 ,对曹禺戏剧定性为现实主义戏剧 ,这是一个时代的共识。该文作者对此定评提出质疑。并首次指出在中国风行了近百年的“现实主义” ,实际上同时指称着两个并存的名同而实不同的现实主义。作者详述了这两个具有对立原则的现实主义的历史由来、各自的实质特征 ,其中 ,重点放在对我国特有的现实主义的阐发上 ,指出她对中国传统“士”文化精神的一脉传承。在这一辨析的基础之上 ,该文作者认为 ,曹禺戏剧既不是中国特有的现实主义 ,也不是西方意义上的现实主义。
During the history of Cao Yu's Criticize, Cao Yu's pla ys were regarded as readistic works and this view was widely received in a whole time. The author raised her doubts about this view and in the first time pointe d out that the Realism which had been popular for more than one hundred years in China in fact meant two paralling but defferent realism. The author discussed t heir own sources and essential features in details and payed her attention to th e interpretation of Chinese particular realism. She pointed out that this partic ular realism inherited Chinese traditional literati culture. On the basis of thi s analysis the author concluded that Cao Yu's plays were distinguished from the other Chinese particular realistic and western realistic plays.
出处
《戏剧(中央戏剧学院学报)》
CSSCI
北大核心
2003年第1期5-48,共44页
Drama:The Journal of the Central Academy of Drama