期刊文献+

间接言语行为中的借代 被引量:31

Metonymy in Indirect Speech Act
下载PDF
导出
摘要 借代是人们用来间接指称人、物、事件的一种修辞手段,认知语言学认为它更是人们认识事物的一种重要方式。索恩伯格和潘塞(Thornburg&Panther)提出了言语行为的脚本理论,认为不少言语行为像许多非言语行为一样,在人们大脑中存储了规约化、程序化的模式,并可分解成相链接的成分;在交际中,脚本中的一个成分可激活并指代整个行为。他们从认知的角度用借代的概念解释了间接言语行为。然而,脚本模式虽然有极大的阐释力,但话语的生成和理解不能不考虑权势、损益度、选择的自由度等语用参数。本文最后在索恩伯格和潘塞行为脚本模式的基础上提出一些修正,以纳入上述语用参数。 Metonymy is a wellknown rhetorical device that is used in everyday communication in order to refer in an indirect way to people, things and events. It is also a cognition method. The action scenario of speech acts, posed by Thornburg and Panther from the perspective of cognition, provides us with a good theoretical grounding for the cognitive function of metonymy. After surveying the action scenario, this paper points out that action scenario is very good for interpreting indirect speech acts, but the pragmatic parameters such as power relationship, costbenefit and optionality, which play important roles in the generation and interpretation of discourse, should be included in the scenario. An elaborated ICM has been proposed in this paper.
作者 李勇忠
机构地区 复旦大学外文系
出处 《解放军外国语学院学报》 北大核心 2003年第2期16-20,共5页 Journal of PLA University of Foreign Languages
基金 国家社科规划项目"英汉言语行为动词语义认知结构"(02BYY002)
关键词 借代 行为脚本 理想化认知模式 语用参数 metonymy action scenario ICM pragmatic parameters
  • 相关文献

参考文献13

  • 1范家材. 英语修辞赏析[M]. 上海: 上海交通大学出版社, 1997.
  • 2Bach, K. & R. Harnish. Linguistic Communication and Speech Acts [M]. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press,1979.
  • 3Gibbs, Raymond W., The Poetics of Mind: Figurative Thought, Language, and Understanding [M]. Cambridge: Cambridge university Press, 1994.
  • 4Gordon, David & George Lakoff. Conversational Postulates [A]. In Peter Cole and Jerry Morgan (eds). Speech Acts(Syntax and Semantics 3)[C]. New York: Academic Press,187-210.
  • 5Hernandez,L.P. & F.J.R. de Mendoza. Grounding, semantic motivation, and conceptual interaction in indirect directive speech acts[J]. Journal of Pragmatics 34 (2002):259-284.
  • 6Lakoff,George. Women, Fire and Dangerous Things[M]. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1987.
  • 7Lakoff, G. & M. Johnson. Metaphor We Live by[M]. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1980.
  • 8Leech, Geoffrey. Principles of Pragmatics[M]. New York: Longman, 1983.
  • 9Levinson, Stephen. Pragmatics[M]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1983.
  • 10Morgan, Jerry L. Two types of convention in indirect speech acts[A]. In Peter Cole (ed), Syntax and Semantics. Vol. 9: Pragmatics[C]. New York: Academic Press, 1978:261-280.

共引文献5

同被引文献297

引证文献31

二级引证文献164

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部