客观的超过要素比较研究

Comparative Study of Objective Extra Factors

我国刑法分则的一些条文的规定存在着令人困惑的罪过疑难问题,即一个法律条文规定的一个具体罪名的罪过形式既有故意又有过失。具体讲,就是在这些条文所规定的犯罪中,行为人明显出于故意实施犯罪行为,但对于刑法明文要求发生的结果却不是出于故意,而且法定刑一般都比较低。储槐植、杨书文先生提出复合罪过形式的学说,张明楷先生则提出客观的超过要素的概念,都试图解决这个难题。相比较而言,客观的超过要素说较为符合实际,具有较高理论及立法价值,但还有必要进行深入的研究。

Some provisions of the Criminal Law of China have some puzzling and complicated problems about an offence,that is,the forms of an offence of a charge which stipulated in one legal provision include negligent and intentional aspects.In order to solve this problem,Mr.Chu Huaizhi and Yang Wenshu put forward the theory of compound forms of an offence,while Mr.Zhang Mingkai advances the concept of objective extra factors.This paper discusses that the concept of objective extra factors is practi-cal and valuable in theoretical study and legislation.