期刊文献+

诉判同一与变更罪名 被引量:10

On the Subject Matter of Criminal Adjudication and Amendment of Charges
下载PDF
导出
摘要 法院在刑事诉讼中有最终确定罪名和适用罚条的权力。但是 ,法院的这一权力应当受到控审分离、不告不理、辩护原则等诸多因素的制约 ,并不得迳行做出恶化被告人的处境的判决。本文对法院变更起诉指控的罪名和罚条问题作了比较分析 ,并阐明了我国法院在刑事判决中变更起诉指控的罪名和罚条应当遵循的规则。 The criminal court has the final saying upon the application of criminal law. But this power is restricted by many factors such as the principles of the separation of prosecution and trial, no trial without charge, and the doctrines of defense and adversary, of which the most important is the trial court shall not pass adjudication that worsening the plight of the defendants that the charges without prior information. The author gives a comparative law study of the amendment of charges by trial court and points out the principles that shall be abide by when our courts doing so.
作者 李昌林
机构地区 西南政法大学
出处 《现代法学》 CSSCI 北大核心 2003年第2期97-101,共5页 Modern Law Science
关键词 刑事诉讼 罪名 诉讼客体 诉讼职能 辩护原则 “诉判同一” 中国 裁判 罪名变更 subject of criminal trial functions of criminal procedure amendment of charges doctrine of defense doctrine of adversary justification of adjudication
  • 相关文献

参考文献6

二级参考文献7

共引文献45

同被引文献98

引证文献10

二级引证文献25

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部