期刊文献+

离子交换与常用陶瓷表面增强技术的对比研究 被引量:3

Comparison of different dental ceramic surface strengthening methods
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的 对比单重离子交换增强技术与常用牙科陶瓷表面增强技术的增强效果。方法 制备VitaVMK 95 ,ShofuVintage标准试件各 3 0个 ,将标准试件随机分 3组 ,A组涂布HX -I型增强剂处理 ,B组进行自身上釉 ,C组进行表面抛光 ,分别测定三点弯曲强度。结果经统计学分析 ,对比不同处理方法的增强效果。结果 A组三点弯曲强度值高于B组 ,B组高于C组 ,结果具有统计学意义 ( p <0 .0 5 )。 Objective Compare the effect of the ion-exchange technique; self-glazing; surface polishing on dental ceramics.Methods Prepare the standard samples of Vita VMK 95, Shofu Vintage ceramics, 30 pieces for each ceramic. The samples were divided into 3 groups. Group A is ion-exchanging group; group B is self-glazing group and group C is surface polishing group. Flexure strength was tested after different treatment. All the data were calculated with SPSS 10.0 Stat. Software. Results The flexure strength of group A was higher than group B and C( p < 0.05 ). Conclusion The effect of surface ion-exchange is better than self-glazing and polishing.
出处 《临床口腔医学杂志》 2003年第4期210-211,共2页 Journal of Clinical Stomatology
关键词 离子交换 陶瓷表面增强技术 对比研究 牙用陶瓷 表面抛光 表面增强 ion-exchange dental ceramic polishing surface strengthening
  • 相关文献

参考文献1

二级参考文献6

  • 1[1]Chisholm RS, Sleighter GE, Emsberger FM. Pittesburgh Plate glass company, assignee. Method of strengthening glass by ion exchange and article made there from[P]. US Patent, 328720.
  • 2[2]Seghi RR, Denry I. Effect of ion exchange on harden and fracture toughness of dental ceramics[J]. Int J Prosthodont, 1992,5(4):309.
  • 3[3]Nobukazu Obi, Fuchu, Koji Ohno. Method for strengthening dental restorative material[P]. US Patent, 4550030.
  • 4[4]Dunn B, Levy MN, Reisbick MH. Improving the fracture resistance of dental ceramic[J]. J Dent Res, 1977, 56(10):1209-1214.
  • 5[5]Naray-Szabo I Inorganic crystal chemistry[M].Budapest: Akademiai Kiado, 1969:3751.
  • 6[6]White SN, Seighi RR. The effect of ion strengthening time/temperature kinetics on the flexural strength of feldspathic porcelains[J].Dent Mater, 1992,8:320-323.

共引文献3

同被引文献32

  • 1康新婷,刘素英,蒋纪麟.牙用KC—1烤瓷粉收缩性能研究[J].实用口腔医学杂志,1994,10(4):252-254. 被引量:2
  • 2Agra CM,Vieira GF.Quantitative analysis of dental porcelain surfaces following different treatments:correlation between parameters obtained by a surface profiling instrument.Dent Mater J,2002,21(1):44-52.
  • 3Whitehead SA,Shearer AC,Watts DC,et al.Comparison of methods for measuring surface roughness of ceramic.J Oral Rehabil,1995,22(6):421-427.
  • 4Whitehead SA,Shearer AC,Watts DC,et al.Comparison of two stylus methods for measuring surface texture.Dent Mater,1999,15(2):79-86.
  • 5Ward MT,Tate WH,Powers JM.Surface roughness of opalescent porcelains after polishing.Oper Dent,1995,20(3):106-110.
  • 6Barghi N,Alexander L,Draugh RA.When to glaze--an electron microscope study.J Prosthet Dent,1976,35(6):648-653.
  • 7Aksoy G,Polat H,Polat M,et al.Effect of various treatment and glazing(coating) techniques on the roughness and wettability of ceramic dental restorative surfaces.Colloids Surf B Biointerfaces,2006,53(2):254-259.
  • 8Dalkiz M,Sipahi C,Beydemir B.Effects of six surface treatment methods on the surface roughness of a low-fusing and an ultra low-fusing feldspathic ceramic material.J Prosthodont,2009,18(2):217-222.
  • 9川井善之.チタンの研磨術式の検討.第10回歯科チタン研究会講演抄録集.東京,1994:52.
  • 10Bollen CML,Papaioannou W,Van Eldere J,et al.The influence of abutment surface roughness on plaque accumulation and peri-implant mucositis.Clin Oral Implants Res,1996,7(3):201-211.

引证文献3

二级引证文献9

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部