期刊文献+

测定醛固酮浓度/肾素活性(SAC/PRA)值在原发性醛固酮增多症中的临床意义 被引量:2

Clinial Significance of Determination of SAC/PRA Value in Patientswith Primary Aldosteronism
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的 :探讨测定SAC/PRA值对原发性醛固酮增多症的诊断价值。方法 :采用放射免疫分析法测定 4 8例原发性醛固酮增多症患者和 3 0例正常人的血浆肾素 (PRA) ,血管紧张素Ⅱ (AT -Ⅱ )以及血清醛固酮(Aldo) ,并计算醛固酮浓度 /肾素活性 (SAC/PRA)比值。结果 :正常组PRA、AT -Ⅱ、Aldo测定值分别为 0 5 7±0 0 8ng/ml/h ,3 6 0 3± 6 11ng/L ,0 3 3± 0 0 4nmol/L ;原醛患者PRA、AT -Ⅱ、Aldo测定值分别为 0 14± 0 0 8ng/ml/h ,2 1 2 1± 7 5 5ng/L ,1 0 7± 0 3 4nmol/L。与正常对照组比较 ,均有极显著性差异 (p <0 0 0 1)。SAC/PRA(ng/dl/ng·ml-1·h-1) 913± 4 0 9。结论 Objective To investigate the diagnostic significance of determining SAC/PRA valve in byperaldosteronism. Methods Plasma renin activity (PRA) and angiotensin (AT-Ⅱ) as well as serum aldosterone contents were measured with RIA in 48 patients with primary aldosteronism and 30 controls. The SAC/PRA value was calculated. Results Contents of PRA, AT-Ⅱ and Aldo in blood of patients with primany aldosteronism were very significantly different from those in controls ( p <0 001) (PRA 0 14±0 08ng/ml/h vs 0 57±0 08ng/ml/h; AT-Ⅱ 21 21±7 55ng/L vs 36 03±6 11ng/L; Aldo 1 07±0 34nmol/L vs 0 33±0 04nmol/L). Calculated SAC/PRA value was 913±409(normal upper limit 400). Conclusion SAC/PRA value is an useful accessory diagnostic criterion for primary aldosteronism.
出处 《放射免疫学杂志》 CAS 2003年第2期71-72,共2页 Journal of Radioimmanology
关键词 测定 原发性醛固酮增多症 诊断 血浆肾素活性 血管紧张素Ⅱ 醛固酮 primary aldostesteronism, plasma renin activity(PRA), angiotensinⅡ(AT-Ⅱ), aldosterone(Aldo)
  • 相关文献

参考文献1

共引文献1

同被引文献18

  • 1王丽萍.肾素-血管紧张素-醛固酮系统在糖尿病及其血管合并症中的作用[J].实用医学杂志,2006,22(5):608-609. 被引量:9
  • 2钱桐荪.肾素-血管紧张素系统的新概念(上)[J].中国中西医结合肾病杂志,2007,8(6):311-313. 被引量:12
  • 3杨柳,刘海林.血浆肾素、血管紧张素Ⅱ和醛固酮与肝纤维化关系的实验研究[J].肝脏,2007,12(3):188-190. 被引量:7
  • 4Hall JE. Historical perspective of the renin-angiotensin system. Mol Biotechnol, 2003, 24: 27-39.
  • 5Drayer JI, Benraad TJ. The reliability of the measurement of plasma renin activity by radioimmunoassay. Clin Chim Acta, 1975, 61 : 309-324.
  • 6Sealey JE. Plasma renin activity and plasma prorenin assays. Clin Chem, 1991, 37 : 1811-1819.
  • 7Morganti A, Pelizzola D, Mantero F, et al. Immunoradiometric versus enzymatic renin assay: results of the Italian Multicenter Comparative Study. Italian Multicenter Study for Standardization of Renin Measurement. J Hypertens, 1995, 13: 19-26.
  • 8Sealey JE, Trenkwalder P, Gahnem F, et al. Plasma renin methodology : inadequate sensitivity and accuracy of direct renin assay for clinical applications compared with the traditional enzymatic plasma renin activity assay. J Hypertens, 1995, 13: 27-30.
  • 9Klickstein LB, Wintroub BU. Separation of angiotensins and assay of angiotensin-generating enzymes by high-performance liquid chromatography. Anal Bioehem, 1982, 120: 146-150.
  • 10Miyazaki T, Kai M, Ohkura Y. Determination of renin activity in human plasma by column-switching high-performance liquid chromatography with fluorescence detection. J Chromatogr, 1989, 490 : 43-51.

引证文献2

二级引证文献8

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部