期刊文献+

现代经典金融学的困境与行为金融学的崛起 被引量:43

The Puzzles of Modern Classical Financial Theory and the Development of Behavioral Finance
原文传递
导出
摘要 现代经典金融学从理性经济人假设出发 ,利用一般均衡分析和无套利分析演绎出一套相当完美的金融学理论。由于现实中人们的实际决策行为与“理性经济人”的假设有着较大差异 ,现代经典金融学遇到一些被称为“未解之谜”的现实问题。行为金融学以心理学对人们实际决策行为的研究成果为基础 ,丰富了对未解之谜的解释 ,逐渐成为金融学研究中的一个重要领域。从研究方法上看 ,行为金融学与现代经典金融学类似 ,即在某种假设的基础上建立模型 ,对金融市场的现象做出的解释。由于人们的实际决策行为具有强烈的状态依赖性 ,行为金融学在不同的状态下对人们的决策行为做出不同的假设和解释是合理的 ,而试图为行为金融学建立一个像经典金融学那样的统一框架是相对困难的。 Using models in which agents are rational, the modern classical financial theory explains financial markets in general equilibrium or no arbitrage framework. However, the human decisions are far from the rational assumptions in reality, there are many puzzles that the modern classical financial theory can't fully explain. Based on the arguments of the psychology research, behavioral finance models give the puzzles some reasonable explanations and become the important research fields of finance. Behavioral finance research is similar with modern classical finance research on methodology, for all of them start with assumptions of human decision. Since the decision behavior is influenced by the state of human, it is reasonable that behavioral finance models provide the different explanations at different state and it is difficult to form a uniform analysis framework for behavioral finance.
出处 《金融研究》 CSSCI 北大核心 2003年第4期44-56,共13页 Journal of Financial Research
基金 国家自然科学基金项目资助 项目批准号 :70 2 730 0 3。
关键词 现代经典金融学 行为金融学 理性经济人 金融市场 心理学 rational agent assumption, psychology, behavioral finance
  • 相关文献

参考文献9

  • 1Barberis,Nicholas, and Ming Huang, 2001, Mental Accounting, Loss Aversion, and Individual Stock Returns, Jottmal of Finance 56, 1247 - 1292.
  • 2Barberis, Nicholas, Ming Huang, and Tano Santos, 2001, Prospect Theory and Asset Prices, Quarterly Journal of Economics116, 1-53.
  • 3Daniel, Kent D., David Hirshleifer, and Avanidhar Subrahmanyam, 2001, Overconfidenc, Arbitrage, and Equilibrim Asaet Pricing, Journal of Finance 56, 921 - 965.
  • 4Grossing, Sanford, J., 1981, An Introduction to the Theory of Rational Expectations Under Asynanetric Information, Reviewof Economic Studies 48, 541 - 559.
  • 5Groseman, Sanford, J. and Stiglitz, J. E., 1980, On the Impossibility of Informationally Efficient Markets, American Economic Review 70, 393 - 408.
  • 6Jackson, M. O., 1991, Equilibrium, Price Formation, and the Value of Private Information, Review of Financial Studies 4,1 - 16.
  • 7Kahneman, Daniel, and Amos Tversky, 1979, Prospect Theory: An Analysis of Decision Under Risk, Econometrica 47, 263-91.
  • 8Odean, Terranee, 1998, Are Investors Reluctant to Realize Their Losses?, Journal of Finance 53, 1775 - 1798.
  • 9Thaler, Richard, 1985, Mental aecotmting and eensumer choice, Marketing Science 4, 199-214.

同被引文献426

引证文献43

二级引证文献252

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部