期刊文献+

犯罪参与理论比较论略——立足于实定法的考察

A Comparative Study of the Theory of Criminal Participation——Based on the Positive Law
原文传递
导出
摘要 在我国刑法上,不同的犯罪参与体系对于成立犯罪与否的判定并无二致。一元犯罪参与体系不存在太多劣势,而二元犯罪参与体系之共犯从属性理论,尤其是犯罪支配理论、共谋共同正犯理论,早已背离了其原本的理论根基——紧缩的行为人概念,呈现出底线突破、混乱不堪的景象。我国刑法理论与审判实践有必要继续坚持一元犯罪参与体系。 In Chinese Criminal Law,different criminal participation systems have no effect on determining a crime or not.There are not so many disadvantages in unary criminal participation system,however,the theory of subordination of accomplice,especially crime domination and complicity co-perpetrators theory,in the binary criminal participation system,has been deviated from its original theoretical basis—tightened concept of actor has presented a disordered scene whose bottom line has been broken.Therefore,it is necessary for Chinese criminal law theory and judicial practice to maintain the unary criminal participation system.
作者 李瑞杰 Li Ruijie
机构地区 西南政法大学
出处 《贸大法律评论》 2016年第1期97-108,共12页 Uibe Legal Science
关键词 预备犯 单一制 区分制 共犯从属性 犯罪参与体系 preparation for crime unary system distinction system subordination of accompbce systems of criminal commitment
  • 相关文献

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部