期刊文献+

Clinical Study on the Relationship between Fixation of Prosthesis and Health of Surrounding Tissues

Clinical Study on the Relationship between Fixation of Prosthesis and Health of Surrounding Tissues
下载PDF
导出
摘要 [Objectives] To explore the effect of mouth outside bonding screw fixation and inside bonding fixation in implanting the prosthesis( crown or bridge) on the health of surrounding tissues,to provide a certain reference for the selection of fixation methods for clinically implanting the prosthesis. [Methods]160 cases of patients needing implanting the prosthesis due to dental arch deficiency were selected. They had excellent alveolar bone. They did not smoke,had no diabetes,and their bone tissue healing was at the early stage. They were randomly divided into A and B groups,80 cases in each group. Group A: the mouth inside and abutment of prosthesis was bonded to a single abutment crown or a single abutment bridge; the bonder on the surface of prosthesis was completely removed and then moved into the implant,and fixed with central retaining screw,this group was called " mouth outside bonding group". Group B: the abutment was located in the implant and fixed using central retaining screw,then the prosthesis( crown or bridge) was bonded to the abutment,the bonder on the surface of prosthesis was removed,and this group was called mouth " mouth inside bonding group". The health condition was compared between two fixing methods for the surrounding tissues of the implant in 24-36 months after restoration. [Results] Group A: the surrounding tissues of the implants for 126 teeth of 80 patients were healthy without occurrence of peripheral inflammation; Group B: in the implants of 112 teeth of 80 patients,7 teeth suffered the peripheral inflammation. Dental implant examination found that there was residue of bonder in the bonding of prosthesis and abutment,3 teeth exfoliated,and 4 teeth were restored after treatment. Through the X2 test,there was significant difference between Group A and Group B( P < 0. 05). [Conclusions] Implant-supported denture often adopts the mouth inside bonding. Since the bonder can not be removed completely,its residue will remain in gingival trough and stimulate the surrounding tissues of the implant and bring about the inflammatory reaction,and even lead to exfoliation of the implant; the mouth inside and abutment of prosthesis was bonded to a single abutment crown or a single abutment bridge,the bonder on the surface of prosthesis was completely removed and then moved into the implant,and fixed with central retaining screw. This method is an effective method for preventing the peripheral inflammation and increasing the success rate of dental implant. [Objectives] To explore the effect of mouth outside bonding screw fixation and inside bonding fixation in implanting the prosthesis( crown or bridge) on the health of surrounding tissues,to provide a certain reference for the selection of fixation methods for clinically implanting the prosthesis. [Methods]160 cases of patients needing implanting the prosthesis due to dental arch deficiency were selected. They had excellent alveolar bone. They did not smoke,had no diabetes,and their bone tissue healing was at the early stage. They were randomly divided into A and B groups,80 cases in each group. Group A: the mouth inside and abutment of prosthesis was bonded to a single abutment crown or a single abutment bridge; the bonder on the surface of prosthesis was completely removed and then moved into the implant,and fixed with central retaining screw,this group was called " mouth outside bonding group". Group B: the abutment was located in the implant and fixed using central retaining screw,then the prosthesis( crown or bridge) was bonded to the abutment,the bonder on the surface of prosthesis was removed,and this group was called mouth " mouth inside bonding group". The health condition was compared between two fixing methods for the surrounding tissues of the implant in 24-36 months after restoration. [Results] Group A: the surrounding tissues of the implants for 126 teeth of 80 patients were healthy without occurrence of peripheral inflammation; Group B: in the implants of 112 teeth of 80 patients,7 teeth suffered the peripheral inflammation. Dental implant examination found that there was residue of bonder in the bonding of prosthesis and abutment,3 teeth exfoliated,and 4 teeth were restored after treatment. Through the X^2 test,there was significant difference between Group A and Group B( P < 0. 05). [Conclusions] Implant-supported denture often adopts the mouth inside bonding. Since the bonder can not be removed completely,its residue will remain in gingival trough and stimulate the surrounding tissues of the implant and bring about the inflammatory reaction,and even lead to exfoliation of the implant; the mouth inside and abutment of prosthesis was bonded to a single abutment crown or a single abutment bridge,the bonder on the surface of prosthesis was completely removed and then moved into the implant,and fixed with central retaining screw. This method is an effective method for preventing the peripheral inflammation and increasing the success rate of dental implant.
出处 《Medicinal Plant》 2017年第2期51-53,56,共4页 药用植物:英文版
关键词 IMPLANT PROSTHESIS MOUTH outside BONDING screw FIXATION MOUTH inside BONDING FIXATION Peri-implant inflammation Implant prosthesis Mouth outside bonding screw fixation Mouth inside bonding fixation Peri-implant inflammation
  • 相关文献

参考文献1

二级参考文献6

  • 1Mckinney RV, Block MS. Endosteal dental implants. st.Louis (USA)Mosby- year book. Inc.1991, part II
  • 2Linkow LI, Parr GR. Factors influencing long- term implant success. J Prosthet Dent ,1990,63(1):64~73
  • 3Eriksson AR, Albrektsson AR, Friberg B, et al. Temperature threshold levels for hear- induced bone tissue injury. A vital- microscopic study in the rabbit. J Prosthet Dent, 1983, 50(1):101~107
  • 4Block MS,Kent JN. Factors associated with soft- and hard- tissue compromise of endosseous implants. J Oral Maxillofac surg,1990, 48:1153~1160
  • 5Weiss CM. A comparative analysis of fibro- osteal and osteal- integration and other variables that affect long term bone maintenance around dental implants. J Oral Implantol, 1987,13(3): 467~87
  • 6Dahl GSA. Osseointegration vs fibro- osseous integration: biomechinical considerations. J Oral Implantol ,1987, 13(3): 520~5261

共引文献12

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部