期刊文献+

论刑事诉讼中私人非法取得证据之效力——以非法证据排除规则为视角 被引量:1

On the Validity of Private Evidence Collection in Criminal Procedure——From the Perspective of Exclusionary Rules of Illegal Evidence
下载PDF
导出
摘要 私人非法取证广泛存在于我国司法实践中,但是刑事诉讼立法没有明确的规定,这导致司法实践中处理标准的混乱。因此,有必要对私人非法取证获得的证据是否具有证据效力进行探究。随着以审判为中心的司法制度的改革推进,庭审实质化正在逐步实现,为了均衡控辩双方的对抗力量,对私人非法取证获得的证据赋予效力很有必要,而且现代经济和科技的发展为私人非法取证提供了很大的便利。当然也不是对所有的私人非法取得证据都给予承认,而是在合适的规则基础上赋予其法律效力。 In China’s judicial practice there exists extensively the private evidence collection,about which there is no clear stipulation in legislation,leading to the confusion of handling standards in judicial practice.Therefore,it is necessary to explore the validity of private evidence collection.With the reform of the judicial system centered on trial,the substantive trial is gradually being realized.In order to balance the opposing forces of the prosecution and the defense,it is necessary to give the legal validity to the illegal evidence collected privately.What’s more,the development of modern economic science and technology has provided great convenience for private evidence collection.Of course,not all the private illegal evidence in accordance with the appropriate rules.
作者 朱雨薇 ZHU Yuwei(School of Law,Zhengzhou University,Zhengzhou 450001,China)
机构地区 郑州大学法学院
出处 《河南工程学院学报(社会科学版)》 2019年第2期57-61,共5页 Journal of Henan University of Engineering(Social Science Edition)
关键词 私人非法取证 非法证据能力认定 非法证据排除规则 private illegal evidence collection identification of illegal evidence validity exclusionary rules of illegal evidence
  • 相关文献

参考文献4

二级参考文献62

共引文献27

同被引文献2

引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部