摘要
'一带一路'沿线国家历史文化传统、宗教信仰以及经济发展水平等参差不齐、各具特色。因此,它们民事法律的冲突是在所难免的。相对国家制定法而言,民间习惯与政治、主权等敏感问题无涉,且具体生动而又顾及个案的特殊性。因此,在国际民事诉讼中适用民间习惯作出的裁判也就更加容易得到国际社会的接受,从而其裁判结果在外国的承认与执行也就较为容易。正因如此,民间习惯规范是解决国际民事法律冲突的较为理想的规范依据。只要其不与公共秩序相抵触,一般可以通过意思自治原则、冲突规范或最密切联系原则进入民事司法程序,化解国际民事法律冲突。
Historical and cultural traditions,religious beliefs and economic development level,and so on,are different in the countries along THE WAY.Therefore,the conflict of their civil law is inevitable.Folk custom are not related to the sensitive issues such as the folk custom and the politics and the sovereignty,and the specific vivid and take the special nature of the cases into account.Therefore,in the international civil and commercial litigation,making judgment by folk custom becomes easier to obtain foreign accepting,so obtaining foreign recognition and enforcement is logical.Because of this,the folk custom is a more ideal standard to resolve the conflict of international civil law.As long as the folk customs are not in conflict with the public order,they can be introduced to the civil procedure to resolve the conflict of international law by means of the principle of autonomy,conflict rules or the principle of the most closely linking.
出处
《民间法》
CSSCI
2016年第2期96-105,共10页
基金
2015年度广东省高校特色创新(人文社科类)项目“依法治国背景下我国裁判规则多元化研究”(2015WTSCX111)
2016年度广州市哲学社会科学发展“十三五”规划“依法治国背景下广州市基层社会治理多元规则优化配置机制研究”(2016GZGJ47)