摘要
从"支配—解放"的话语谱系来看,生态女性主义着重从社会文化层面考察支配的成因,认为自然支配和性别支配的根源在于父权制,主张重构女性与自然的联系,通过消除父权制来达成女性和自然共同解放之目的。与生态女性主义的文化批判论不同,马克思主义是革命的浪漫主义。马克思主义基于社会实践基础建构起自然和女性的现实联系,认为自然支配和性别支配的根源在于私有制,主张通过消灭私有制,进而实现自然和女性的双重解放。
From the perspective of the'domination-liberation'discourse pedigree,Ecofeminism pays emphasis on examining the causes of domination from the social cultural level,points out the fact that natural domination and gender domination root in the patriarchy,advocates refactoring the contact of female with nature,and puts forward to reach the purpose of the common liberation of female and nature by eliminating patriarchy. Different from the cultural criticism of Ecofeminism,Marxism is a revolution romanticism. On the basis of the social practice,Marxism builds the real contact between the nature and female,insists that natural domination and gender domination root in private ownership,abolishing private ownership in order to achieve the double liberations of female and nature.
出处
《马克思主义理论学科研究》
CSSCI
2016年第4期155-161,共7页
Studies on Marxist Theory