“新事物”与“旧事物”的理论误区

Misunderstandings about New Things and Old Things

哲学教科书对于“新事物”和“旧事物”的释义存在循环论证的现象 ,而且离开主体的尺度纯粹从“客观必然性”去说明新旧事物的区别陷入了“客观主义”的误区。从本质上说 ,新事物和旧事物是评价范畴 ,必须考虑主体的尺度 ,新事物是指新出现的符合客观规律并对人的发展有积极意义的事物。由于传统释义的不够准确和科学 ,因而在这两个概念的使用和评价上也存在较严重的理论误区。

In the philosophy textbook, there exists arguing in a circle about the definitions of 'new things' and 'old things', and the practice of explaining their difference from just the objective necessity without thinking of subject. New things and old things in nature belong in the field of appraisement and we must think about subject. New things refer to those that newly emerge, tally with objective laws and are conductive to human development. Because the traditional definition is inaccurate and not scientific enough, there are serious misunderstandings about the use and evaluation of the two definitions.