期刊文献+

《名利场》语用解读——文学语用学探索之一 被引量:19

Pragmatic account of Vanity Fair
下载PDF
导出
摘要 文学语用学是一门新兴的边缘学科。运用该学科的主要理论———言语行为理论剖析《名利场》可以发现,整体特色是反讽,具体表现在三个层面:苏格拉底似的反讽叙述、人物间的反讽对话和人物的反讽命运。这部作品的从言语行为角度分析《名利场》的反讽特色对揭示作者的批判精神以及呼唤读者的参与和合作具有独特的作用。 Literary pragmatics is a new interdiscipline.This paper draws on the methodology of speechact theory ,a dominant theory in literary pragmatics, to make an analysis of Vanity Fair, pointing out that irony is the fundamental device of the fiction, which can be shown in three aspects: Socratic ironic narratives, ironic dialogues between characters and nearly all the characters' ironic fates. An analysis of ironic features of Vanity Fair, based on speech acts, contributes greatly to the revealment of the author's critical spirit and anticipation of readers' participation and cooperation.
作者 涂靖
出处 《四川外语学院学报》 2002年第6期81-84,共4页 Journal of Sichuan International Studies University
关键词 名利场 反讽 言语行为 批判精神 读者反应 Vanity Fair irony speech act critical spirit readers' reaction
  • 相关文献

参考文献8

  • 1W.萨克雷.名利场[Z].杨必译.南京:译林出版社,1994.文中所注页码均出自该译本.
  • 2Haverkate, H. A Speech Act Analysis of Irony [J]. Journal of Pragmatics, 1990,(14): 77-109.
  • 3Littman, D.C. & J.L. Mey. A Computational Model of Irony[J]. Journal of Pragmatics, 1991,(15):131- 151.
  • 4Petrey, S. Speech Acts and Literary Theory [M]. London and New York: Routledge, Chapman and Hall, INC. 1990.
  • 5Searle, J.R. Speech Acts [M]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1969.
  • 6Searle, J. R. Expression and Meaning [M]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1979.
  • 7Sell,R.D. Literary Pragmatics [M]. Amsterdam: North Holland Publishing Company, 1993.
  • 8Wheatley, J.H. Patterns in Thackeray's Fiction [M]. Massachusetts: MIT Press, 1969.

同被引文献166

引证文献19

二级引证文献56

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部