期刊文献+

未定罪没收程序的证明规则及证明标准

On Rules & Standards of Confiscating Proofs Not Being Convicted
下载PDF
导出
摘要 新刑事诉讼法在刑事特别程序中确立了未定罪没收程序,检控机关通过证明应予追缴的犯罪所得和犯罪工具与被控的刑事罪名有因果关系,在犯罪嫌疑人、被告人逃匿、死亡的情况下通过合法程序予以没收涉案财物。未定罪没收程序的诉讼标的是物不是人,其并不涉及人身自由权的剥夺而仅仅是一个关乎财产权的问题。因此,为充分保障权利主张者的合法财产权益,必须明确检控机关和合法财产权利主张者的证明责任,明确没收程序的证明标准来完善这一制度。 The new Code of Criminal Procedure establishes special procedures in criminal forfeiture procedures that were not convicted,prosecuting authority by proving proceeds and instrumentalities of crime should be recovered and charged with criminal offenses,there is a causal relationship between the suspect,the defendant into hiding,death forfeiture of property involved in the case through legal procedures. No conviction is the subject of forfeiture proceedings litigation matter is not a person,it does not involve deprivation of personal liberty but merely a matter of issue relating to property rights. Therefore,in order to fully protect the legitimate rights and interests of property rights advocates,the prosecution must prove a clear responsibility and authority of the legitimate property rights advocates,a clear standard of proof forfeiture procedures to perfect the system.
作者 毕锦明
机构地区 郑州大学法学院
出处 《绵阳师范学院学报》 2015年第1期32-35 49,共5页 Journal of Mianyang Teachers' College
关键词 未定罪没收程序 证明责任 涉案财产 利害关系人 优势证据 No conviction forfeiture proceedings burden of proof involving property interested parties preponderance of the evidence
  • 相关文献

参考文献3

  • 1樊崇义主编.刑事诉讼法学[M]. 法律出版社, 2004
  • 2徐久生,庄敬华.德国刑法典[M]中国法制出版社,2000.
  • 3孙长永著.日本刑事诉讼法导论[M]. 重庆大学出版社, 1993

共引文献14

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部