期刊文献+

人格权平等的法人类学关怀——对马林诺夫斯基思想的另一种言说

LEGAL ANTHROPOLOGICAL CARING ON THE EQUALITY OF PERSONALITY RIGHT:A DIFFERENT INTERPRETATION ON MALINOWSKI'S THOUGHT
下载PDF
导出
摘要 人类学家马林诺夫斯基具有传奇色彩的学术经历,由其所开创的现代法人类学田野调查方法逐渐得到后世学者的重视和呼应,但是很少人着墨去关注马氏人类学思想中的人格权平等观念,亦即用法人类学的维度来解读他本人及其经典著述。马林诺夫斯基对人性尊严的关注不仅体现了人类学研究的内在本旨,同时也诠释了平等之法律价值。据此,从所有人类属性之人格权平等视角来厘析马林诺夫斯基早期人类学中平等价值主题的哲学伦理,实乃为全球不断复苏的后民族主义、种族主义、民粹主义以及相延伸的民族恐怖主义治理提供了一剂良方。 The legendary academic experience of an anthropologist, Malinowski and the fieldwork method of modern legal anthropology he created were attached its due importance by later scholars gradually,but few people paid attention to the concept of the equality of personality right in his anthropological thought which is to interpret himself and his classic works from the perspective of legal anthropology. Malinowski's caring about human dignity not only implied the essence of anthropological study, but illustrated the legal value of equality as well. Therefore, the analysis on Malinowski's early philosophical ethics of the value of equality from the aspect of the equality of personality right provided a good solution for post-nationalism,racialism,populism,and national terrorism which are reviving globally.
作者 曾哲 周泽中
出处 《广西民族研究》 CSSCI 北大核心 2016年第6期48-54,共7页 GUANGXI ETHNIC STUDIES
关键词 法人类学 人格权平等 人性尊严 田野调查 legal anthropology the equality of personality right human dignity fieldwork
  • 相关文献

参考文献3

二级参考文献27

  • 1陈雅丽,曾哲.论宪法品格[J].湖北社会科学,2006(12):152-155. 被引量:1
  • 2Strathern, Marilyn. Out of Context: The Persuasive Fictions of Anthropology [ J]. Current Anthropology, Vol. 28, No. 3 (Jun. , 1987). 251--81.
  • 3Leach, Edmund. Reflections on a Visit to Nemi : Did Frazer Get It Wrong? [ J ]. Anthropology Today, Vol. 1, No. 2 (Apr. , 1985). 2--3.
  • 4Leach, Edmund. , and Herbert Weisinger. Reputations [ J]. Daedalus, Vol. 90, No. 2, Ethnic Groups in American Life (Soring, 1961 ). 371--399.
  • 5Hyman, Stanley E. The Tangled Bank: Darwin, Marx, Frazer and Freud as Imaginative Writer [ M ]. New York: Atheneum, 1962. 189--291.
  • 6Jarvie, I. C. The Revolutionary in Anthropology [ M]. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul, 2002. 170--224.
  • 7Leach, Edmund., and I. C. Jarvie, Edwin Ardener, J. H. M. Beattie, Ernest Gellner, K. S. Mathur. Frazer and Malinowski: A CA Discussion [J]. Current Anthropology, Vol. 7, No. 5 (Dec., 1966). 560--76.
  • 8Symonolewicz, Konstantin Symmons. , and Edmund Leach. On Malinowski, Frazer, and Evolutionism [ J ]. Current Anthropology, Vol. 9, No. 1 (Feb., 1968). 66--68.
  • 9Smith, Jonathan Z. When the Bough Breaks [J]. History of Religions, Vol. 12, No. 4 (May, 1973). 342--71.
  • 10Albright, Daniel. Shades of " The Golden Bough" [ J]. Virginia Quarterly Review, 49 : 3 (Summer, 1973). 461.

共引文献13

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部