摘要
民法典草案是原封不动地将现行法编入 ,是彻底的松散式和汇编式的 ,与人民所期望的民法典差距甚大。中国应当制定一部具有逻辑性和体系性的民法典 ,1 0 0年前 ,前人已经替我们作出了选择 ,在历经百年所形成的法律传统面前 ,任何立法者和学者都是渺小的。取消“债权”概念和“债权总则编”的理由站不住脚。人格权不应单独设编 ,基本理由在于人格权的特殊本质。
The draft of Civil Cold is the compilation of the existing laws without any changes. It is in incompact and assembled style, which is far from people's expectation. China should make a civil code with logic and system/ A century ago, our ancestors have made options for us. In frond of the legal tradition that has undergone a hundred years, any legislators and scholars are chickenshit. There is no ground for canceling the concepts 'right of obligation' and 'the General Principles of Right of Obligation'. The right of personality shall notbe put in a separate part. The basic reason for it is the special nature of the right of personality.
出处
《政法论坛》
CSSCI
北大核心
2003年第1期9-14,共6页
Tribune of Political Science and Law
关键词
民法典
中国国情
法律传统
债权
人格权
立法
Draft of Civil Code
Legal Tradition
Part of the General Principles of Right of Obligation
Right of Personality