期刊文献+

偏至:现代文学的价值走向

Deviation: the Value Orientation of Modern Literature
下载PDF
导出
摘要 五四新文化运动所提出的“立人”标准理应是中国现代文学的价值走向 ,但现代文学在其发展过程中 ,事实上却逐渐偏离了这一正确走向。早期共产党人与个别激进作家是这种偏至的始作佣者 ,而无产阶级革命文学运动则将其进一步导向了集体主义、阶级本位 ,所幸的是非主流文学继承了五四文学的价值走向 ,才使得三十年代的文学显得丰富多彩。但抗战使主流、非主流文学都汇集于民族本位 ,文学因此而走向了狭窄的通道 。 The 'moralization' standard, which was proposed during the May 4 Movement, should have been the value orientation of the modern Chinese literature, but in fact it deviates from this correct direction. Some earlier communists and radical writers are the initiators. The proletarian revolutionary literature movement directs it towards collectivism and class standard. Fortunately, the non-mainstream literature inherits the value orientation of the May 4 Movement, making the literature of the 1930s colorful and varied. But the Resistance War converges the mainstream and the non-mainstream literatures into the standard of nationality. Mao Zedong's Address at Yan-an turns the standard of nationality into class standard, with workers and farmers as the top priority. This leads literature into a narrow alley, hardly leaving masterpieces matching with the great times in China.
作者 李涌泉
出处 《宝鸡文理学院学报(社会科学版)》 2003年第2期39-44,共6页 Journal of Baoji University of Arts and Sciences:Social Science Edition
关键词 现代文学 价值走向 偏至 modern literature value orientation deviation
  • 相关文献

参考文献14

  • 1[1]鲁迅.热风[M].北京:人民文学出版社,1972.
  • 2[3]陈独秀语粹[Z].北京:华夏出版社,1993.
  • 3[2]马克思恩格斯选集:第3卷[M].北京:人民出版社,1972.425.
  • 4[4]马克斯恩格斯全集:第3卷[M].北京:人民出版社,1972.
  • 5[5]列宁全集:第31卷[M].北京:人民出版社 ,1972.392.
  • 6[6]茅盾文艺杂论集[M].上海:文艺出版社,1981.
  • 7[7]郁达夫文集[M].广州:花城出版社,1982.
  • 8[8]饶鸿竞竞等.创造社资料[C].福州:福建人民出版社,1982.
  • 9[6]"革命文学"论争资料选编[C].北京:人民文学出版社,1981.
  • 10[10]马良春,张大明.三十年代左翼文艺资料选编[C].成都:四川人民出版社,1983.

共引文献673

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部