摘要
关于犯罪客体问题 ,理论界分歧较大 ,有许多不同观点。就其合理性而言 ,法益说比较妥当 ,即犯罪客体 ,应当是指被犯罪行为所侵害的、由我国刑法所保护的法益。其根据主要在于 :一是深刻揭示了犯罪所侵害的实质 ,二是在理论逻辑上无懈可击 ,三是切合了现代民主政治和人权观念的新发展 ,四是具有其特殊的机能 ,五是完全切合我国刑事立法和司法实践。但是 ,法益理论本身也面临许多挑战与悖论 ,尤其是法益价值构造与价值取向等方面还存在许多需要进一步研究的问题。
On the issue of object of crime,academic circles have lots of conflicting opinions and put forward various ideas.As to the rationality,the theory of legal interests--that is,object of crime should be regarded as legal interests violated by criminal behaviors and protected by the criminal law of China--sounds reasonable.Its existing foundation mainly lies in five aspects.But the theory of legal interests is also confronted with much challenge and paradox,expecially the questions on the construction of value and the tendency of value of legal interests.
关键词
犯罪客体
法益
存在根据
价值构造
价值取向
object of crime
legal interests
existing foundation
the construction of value
the tendency of value
