期刊文献+

“劉言史法,吾言史意”——章学诚与刘知几史学歧异探析 被引量:3

Liu's Interest is the Historical Method, but My Concern with the View of History ": A Study of the Differences in Historiography between Zhang Xuecheng and Liu Zhiji
下载PDF
导出
摘要 “史法”与“史意”是章学诚的重要学术术语,是研究章学诚与刘知几史学异同关系的关键,也是把握章学诚史学思想的关键。本文从章学诚所界定之“史学”涵义入手,认为“史意”是针对一家著述而言,“史法”是针对馆局纂修而言,“史法”与“史意”能够体现出章学诚与刘知几的分歧所存。 The historical method ' and ' the view of history ' are Zhang Xuecheng's important academic terminologies. They are the keys for the research of the differences in historiography between Zhang Xuecheng and Liu Zhiji and of Zhang Xuecheng's historiography. On the basis of Zhang Xuecheng' s own idea of 'historiography', This article thinks that 'the view of history' is in accordance with private works of history which will become a academic family, but ' The historical method ' only with official historiography. So the two terminologies can show the differences between Zhang Xuecheng and Liu Zhiji.
作者 梁继红
机构地区 北京大学中文系
出处 《古籍整理研究学刊》 2003年第2期83-87,共5页 Journal of Ancient Books Collation and Studies
关键词 章学诚 刘知几 史学 史法 史意 Zhang Xuecheng Liu Zhiji historiography the historical method the view of history
  • 相关文献

参考文献1

  • 1杜维运.清代史学与史家[M]中华书局,1988.

同被引文献8

引证文献3

二级引证文献2

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部