期刊文献+

行政复审反倾销税率与社会福利最大化税率优劣比较

Difference Research between AD Rates Based on Different Hypotheses under Dynamic Game of Imperfect Information
下载PDF
导出
摘要 本文首先根据博弈论及经济学有关原理,分别推导出依据现行反倾销法律法规规定的计算行政复审反倾销税率的公式以及按照国内社会福利最大化原则的计算行政复审反倾销税率的优化模型;其次,根据经济学有关原理对计算行政复审反倾销税率进行比较研究,发现现行反倾销税率的计算公式存在诸多缺陷;最后。 In accordance with the principles of game theory and economics,the authors first derived two models for calculating AD rates based on current regulations of AD and the principle of maximizing domestic social welfare,respectively.The authors then made a comparative analysis of the two models,and concluded that there are several shortcomings in the AD rate model based on current regulations of AD.Finally,the authors suggested that both China and WTO should use the optimal model for calculating the AD rate.
机构地区 上海交通大学
出处 《管理评论》 2003年第3期15-18,共4页 Management Review
  • 相关文献

参考文献5

  • 1费方域等译.微观经济学:现代观点[M].上海三联书店上海人民出版社,1994.12..
  • 2李圣敬.反倾销法律与诉讼代理[M].法律出版社,2000..
  • 3王方华,钟根元.国外对我国倾销及我国反倾销体制建立的博弈分析[J].对外经贸实务,2002(1):9-12. 被引量:10
  • 4Thomas J.Pmsa. On the spread and impact of dumping. NBER Working Paper No.7404, 1999.10
  • 5Bruce A. Jee-Hyeong Park (2001): Dynamic pricing in the presence of AD policy. NBER working paper No.8477 2001.10

共引文献18

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部