摘要
著名的“罗素、策墨罗、哈克”(简称“RZH”)解悖标准内含两个条件 :严格的“形式刻划”和不严格的“哲学说明”。前者的严格性实质上是以后者的非严格性为依归 ,从而大大增加了评价“解悖方案”的复杂性和困难性。“RZH”标准也是有缺点的 ,并内含形式逻辑派的“偏见”。
The standard of Russell Zermelo Haack about paradox resolving(called'RZH') contains two conditions: Strict 'formal portrait' and not strict 'philosophical explanation'. The strictness of the former depends on non strictness of the latter. It has increased the difficulty and complexity of appraising 'paradox resolving programs' greatly. The 'RZH'standard also has shortcoming ,and contains prejudice of the formal logic school.
出处
《河池师专学报》
2003年第1期5-9,共5页
Journal of Hechi Normal College
关键词
形式逻辑派
解悖标准
解悖偏见
“RZH”标准
悖论
拟似矛盾
哲学说明
语境教感方案
formal portrait
pseudo contradiction
philosophical explanation
context sensitive program
RZH standard
prejudice of the formal logic school