摘要
通过运距、安定性、占用耕地、容量、容积与面积比、场内及下方工业设施和村庄、对河道的影响等方面 ,对龙门山石灰石矿原设计排土场与新选排土场进行对比分析。综合比较 ,新排土场最佳 ,其次为杨凹排土场。云中寺排土场的选址不恰当 ,茅子山 2 #和 3 #排土场与云中寺排土场相差不大 ,建议不予利用。事实证明云中寺排土场多次发生滑塌事故 ,还发生泥石流 ,造成巨大经济损失 ,花费巨大治理费用和相当多的人力和物力。
The selection of the earth piling site for Longmenshan Limestone Mine is illustrated by comparison and analysis of the original designed earth piling sites and the new one in aspects of the transportation distance, stability, occupation of territory, capacity, volume and area ratio, inner or downstream factories and villages, effects on rivers, etc The earth piling site is the best, and the second is the Yangao earth piling site The Yunzhongsi earth piling site is not proper, nor the Maozishan 2 # and 3 # earth piling sites, they are not suggested to be adopted In practice, there many sliding and collapsing accidents occurred, and also the mud rock flow occurred, economical loss and treatment cost are enormous
出处
《有色金属》
CSCD
2003年第2期119-121,126,共4页
Nonferrous Metals
关键词
采矿工程
石灰石矿
排土场
选址
mining engineering
limestone mine
earth piling site
site selection