试论概念间的交叉关系——与吴家麟、欧阳中石、李廉等同志商榷

OVERLAPPING IS IMPOSSIBLE BETWEEN SUBDIVISIONAL CONCEPTS OF CRIMES

按同一根据划分的各子项概念之间是不可能存在交叉关系的,否则就犯了子项相容的逻辑错误。如;'贪污犯'、'盗窃犯'就是以犯罪性质为根据对'罪犯'概念所进行的划分,两者作为'罪犯'的子项概念在外延上必然是互相排斥的。而认定这两者具有概念交叉关系的同志,则是混淆了作为思维形式的概念其外延间的交叉与客观对象的复杂性这两者的区别。交叉关系的概念只存在于同一概念按不同根据划分的各子项概念之间,这是客观对象本质属性多样性的反映。

Overlapping is impossible and illogical between concepts of crime,which are subdivided on the same ground,such as between'graft'and'Iarceny',In extension such subdivisional concepts are mutually exclusive.Those who, like Comrades Wu Jialing,Ouyang Zhongshi and Li Lian,believe that such concepts can overlap in fact confuse the overlapping of concepts as thought forms and their extensions on the one hand and the complexions of objects on the other.Overlapping can logically exist only between copcepts which are subdivided on different grounds.This is a reflection of the variety of essential attributes of objectives.