期刊文献+

经济体制转型的动态演化分析:一个沉淀成本方法 被引量:1

The Analysis of Dynamic Evolution of Economic Transition:A Sunk Cost Perspective
原文传递
导出
摘要 由新古典经济学和规范决策理论可知,沉淀成本已经支付了,因其不构成机会成本,所以它不应该影响当前或未来决策,体现沉淀成本决策不相关。然而,由于沉淀成本决策不相关的假设前提十分苛刻,所以,在经济体制转型时期,因有限理性、市场不完全或者委托代理等原因,沉淀成本十分普遍,决策者往往考虑过去发生的沉淀成本,从而出现沉淀成本决策相关性问题。因此,一方面,我们需要承认经济体制转型时期沉淀成本问题的存在;另一方面,需要采取恰当的非正式和正式制度克服沉淀成本负面效应,以及加强沉淀成本管理,从而加速经济体制转型,这对于构建中国特色的社会主义市场经济体制十分重要,从而可以预测经济体制动态演化背后的经济逻辑和一般规律,为经济转型再次进行微观经济分析提供一种新的分析方法。 The existing economic literature on econom- ic transition is drawn from the neoclassical economics under perfect information or rational expectation, which ignore the sunk cost effect,that is,current or future decision should not be influenced by sunk cost incurred by the planned system,characterized by irrel- evance of sunk costs.However we found that there are a lot of sunk cost phenomena during the transition under imperfect information or bounded rationality, that is,decision relevance of sunk costs.Therefore we provide some solution to sunk cost problem in order to speed up the transition from the planned system in- to the market system.
出处 《南大商学评论》 2007年第3期126-142,共17页 Nanjing Business Review
基金 国家社会科学基金项目(08CJY021) 全国教育科学十一五规划项目(CFA060066)的资助
关键词 经济转型 新古典经济学 沉淀成本动态演化 economic transition neoclassic economics sunk cost dynamic evolution
  • 相关文献

参考文献19

二级参考文献36

  • 1索尔斯坦·凡勃伦,贾根良.经济学为什么不是一门演化(进化)科学?[J].政治经济学评论,2004(2):127-137. 被引量:8
  • 2田国强.现代经济学的基本分析框架与研究方法[J].经济研究,2005,40(2):113-125. 被引量:293
  • 3汪丁丁.何谓“直面现象”的经济学?[J].读书,2004(2):116-121. 被引量:7
  • 4道.诺斯.制度变迁理论纲要[J].改革,1995(3):52-56. 被引量:203
  • 5[1]Arnott,Richard, and Joseph E. Stiglitz, 1991 :"Moral Hazard and Nonmarket Institutions: Dysfunctional Crowding Out or Peer Monitoring?" American Economic Review 81 (March):179-90.
  • 6[2]Coase, R. H. , 1937: "The Nature of the Firm", Economica, 386-405.
  • 7[4]Coleman, James S. , 1988: "Social Capital in the Creation of Human Capital", American Journal of Sociology 94 (Supplement) :S95-S120.
  • 8[5]Dasgupta, Partha, 1999: "Economic Development and the Idea of Social Capital", Processed, Faculty of Economics, University of Cambridge.
  • 9[6]Tiebout, C. M. , 1956(1988): "A Pure Theory of Local Expenditures", In Martin Ricketts ed., Neoclassical Micraeconomics, Vol. 2, Schools of Thoughts in Economics Series, No. 3. Aldershot, Hants, U. K.: Edward Elgar Publishing; and Brookfield, Vermont: Gower Publishing.
  • 10[3]——1960: "On The Problem of Social Cost", Journal of Law and Economics,Vol. 3: 1-44.

共引文献399

同被引文献23

  • 1UNRUH G C.Understanding carbon lock-in[J].Energy Policy,2000,28(12):817-830.
  • 2WITT U.“Lock-in”vs.“critical masses”:industrial change under network externalities[J].International Journal of Industrial Organization,1997,15(6):753-773.
  • 3ARTHUR W B.Competing technologies:an overview[M]//GOVANNI DOSI.TECHNICAL CHANGE AND ECONOMIC THEORY.London:Pinter Publishers,1988:590-607.
  • 4ARROW K.The economic implications of learning by doing[J].Review of Economic Studies,1962(29):155-173.
  • 5ROSENBERG N.Inside the black box:technology and economics[M].New York:Cambridge University Press,1982.
  • 6LUNDVALL B A.National systems of innovation:towards a theory of innovation and interactive learning[M].London:Pinter Publishers,1992.
  • 7MARCH J G.Rationality,foolishness,and adaptive intelligence[J].Strategic Management Journal,2006(27):201-214.
  • 8ECONOMIDES N.Network externalities,complementarities,and invitations to enter[J].European Journal of Political Economy,1996,12(2):211-233.
  • 9ARTHUR W B.Competing technologies,increasing returns,and lock-in by historical events[J].Economic Journal,1989,(99):116-131.
  • 10DAVID P A.Clio and economics of QWERTY[J].American Economic Review,1985(75):332-337.

引证文献1

二级引证文献4

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部