期刊文献+

个体主动社会化行为对知识获取的作用机制研究:基于工作场所移动非正式学习网络情境

Study on the Mechanism of Individual Active Social Behavioron Knowledge Acquisition at Workplace of Mobile Informal Learning Network
原文传递
导出
摘要 本文以工作场所——移动非正式学习网络为研究背景,探究组织中个体知识获取的机制。通过实证分析验证了个体主动社会化行为对个体工作知识获取的影响,以及社会资本在个体主动社会化行为和组织个体知识获取中的中介作用,并验证知识隐性程度在个体主动社会化行为与组织个体知识获取之间的调节作用。通过实证分析发现主动社会化行为对知识获取具有显著的正向预测作用。社会资本在个体主动社会化行为与知识获取之间存在中介效应。知识的隐性程度对个体主动社会化行为与知识获取之间都不存在调节作用。 This paper takes the workplace-mobile informal learning network as the research background,and explores the mechanism of individual knowledge acquisition in the organization.Empirical analysis verifies the effect of individual’s active socialization on individual work knowledge acquisition,and the mediating role of social capital in individual active socialization behavior and organizational individual knowledge acquisition,and verifies the degree of knowledge implicitness in individual active socialization behavior.Organizational individual regulation of knowledge acquisition.Through empirical analysis,it is found that active social behavior has a significant positive predictive effect on knowledge acquisition.There is a mediating effect of social capital between individual active socialization behavior and knowledge acquisition.The degree of implicitness of knowledge does not have a regulatory effect on individual active socialization behavior and knowledge acquisition.
作者 王翔 王柳 刘梦格 Xiang Wang;Liu Wang;Mengge Liu
机构地区 南京大学商学院
出处 《南大商学评论》 CSSCI 2018年第3期74-87,共14页 Nanjing Business Review
基金 国家社会科学基金项目“网络学习共同体视角下企业学习支持与治理机制研究(14BGL077)”的资助
关键词 知识获取 主动社会化行为 社会资本 移动社交网络 知识隐性程度 Knowledge acquisition Active social behavior Social capital Mobile social network The degree of knowledge recession
  • 相关文献

参考文献4

二级参考文献43

  • 1温忠麟,张雷,侯杰泰,刘红云.中介效应检验程序及其应用[J].心理学报,2004,36(5):614-620. 被引量:7704
  • 2温忠麟,侯杰泰,张雷.调节效应与中介效应的比较和应用[J].心理学报,2005,37(2):268-274. 被引量:3155
  • 3温忠麟,张雷,侯杰泰.有中介的调节变量和有调节的中介变量[J].心理学报,2006,38(3):448-452. 被引量:743
  • 4[3]MacKinnon D P, Lockwood C M, Hoffman J M, West S G, Sheets V. A Comparison of methods to test mediation and other intervening variable effects. Psychological Methods, 2002, 7(1): 83~104
  • 5[4]MacKinnon D P, Lockwood C M, Hoffman J M. A new method to test for mediation. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Society for Prevention Research, Park City, UT. 1998, June
  • 6[5]Duncan O D, Featherman D L, Duncan B. Socioeconomic background and achievement. New York: Seminar Press, 1972
  • 7[6]James L R, Brett J M. Mediators, moderators and tests for mediation. Journal of Applied Psychology, 1984,69(2): 307~321
  • 8[7]Judd C M, Kenny D A. Process analysis: Estimating mediation in treatment evaluations. Evaluation Review, 1981, 5(5): 602~619
  • 9[8]Baron R M, Kenny D A. The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1986, 51(6): 1173~1182
  • 10[9]Sobel M E. Asymptotic confidence intervals for indirect effects in structural equation models. In: S Leinhardt (Ed.). Sociological methodology 1982. Washington, DC: American Sociological Association, 1982. 290~312

共引文献8964

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部