期刊文献+

典权制度比较研究 被引量:17

A Comparative Study of the Pawning System
下载PDF
导出
摘要 民法典的编纂 ,为中国新时代的历史任务 ,其中尤以典权制度最具中国传统特色 ,如何有效融入现今民法体系 ,并合理保留其原有概念 ,向来为学者间争议之焦点。就此 ,笔者为全面深入探索中国典权之存在价值及真意 ,藉由中韩两国三地典权制度相互比较方式 ,剖析典权的意义、法律性质、取得、期限 ,效力、消灭、社会功能及现状等方面 。 The compilation of the civil code is a historical mission in China's new epoch. Of the regulations of the civil code, the system of pawning right is most characteristic of Chinese traditions. How to integrate pawning right into today's civil law system while reasonably keeping its original conception has always remained the point of issue among the scholars. In order to make an overall and deep going exploration of the value and essence of the existence of the pawning right in China, this paper compares the pawning right in China's Mainland, Taiwan and Korea, analyses such aspects as the meaning, legal nature, obtainment, term, effect, elimination, social function and status quo of the pawning right. This paper concludes by inferring a pawning right system suitable for China's Mainland.
机构地区 复旦大学法学院
出处 《复旦学报(社会科学版)》 CSSCI 北大核心 2003年第3期80-85,140,共7页 Fudan Journal(Social Sciences)
关键词 物权 用益物权 典权 民法典 real right, usufruct, pawning right
  • 相关文献

参考文献2

二级参考文献19

共引文献77

同被引文献121

引证文献17

二级引证文献61

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部