司法裁判中法官价值选择的证成

Justification of Judges' Value Choice in Judicial Adjudication

司法裁判中法官不同的价值选择导致不同裁判结果的产生。法官恣意的价值选择危害司法裁判的可预见性,因而法官对自己在司法裁判中的价值选择有证成的义务。法官价值选择的证成是否为一种法律论证,怎样成其为一种法律论证,是司法裁判不能回避的问题。在司法裁判过程中,以权衡的方法路径实现裁判的法律证成,作为"等级式"适用的价值选择,作为裁判法律推理的逻辑起点时,其适用方法具有"二值性"。价值选择应实现优先性的证成。优先性难以通过价值标准的位序实现,结果优先成为现实的选择。保证法官价值选择证成的担保是法官作出裁判的法律制度。

Value options for judges influences judicial decisions,which leads to the emergence of different judicial decisions. The judging value choice of the judge jeopardizes the predictability of the judicial judgment,and the judge has a witnessed obligation to choose his own value in the judicial judgment. Whether the evidence of the judge’s value choice is a legal argument,how to become a legal argument is a problem that the judicial judge cannot avoid. As a kind of legal argument,in the process of judicial adjudication,the legal method of the referee is realized by the method of weighing the method,and as the value choice of 'hierarchical',as the logical starting point of the legal reasoning of the referee,the applicable method also has 'two-Value'. Value selection should achieve priority certification. Priority is difficult to achieve through the order of the value standard,and the result is a realistic choice. The guarantee that guarantees the judge’s value selection is the legal system for the judge to make a judgment.