期刊文献+

五家渠地区急性心肌梗死治疗现状调查

下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:调查五家渠地区急性心肌梗死(AMI)患者治疗现状。方法:分析4年来514例AMI的药物使用情况、再灌注治疗、就诊方式、时间与主要心血管事件(MACE)及住院期间病死率。结果:(1)药物治疗及再灌注治疗:98.5%接受抗血小板治疗,58.4%服用β受体阻滞剂,67.6%服用血管紧张素转换酶抑制剂(ACEI)或血管紧张素受体拮抗剂(ARB),98.4%服用他汀类药物,72.2%服用硝酸酯,0.78%行临时起搏治疗。STEMI患者426例中行药物溶栓再灌注治疗149例(35%)。(2)诊治延迟时间:呼叫120急救车(181例)、自行就诊(318例)、院内发生(15例),3种就诊方式的发病至就诊、发病至第1份心电图、发病至接受专科治疗时间中位数差异均有统计学意义(<0.05)。(3)MACE和院内死亡:514例AMI患者院内死亡66例(12.8%),其中NSTEMI患者死亡8例,STEMI患者58例。发生主要心血管事件84例(16.3%),其中NSTEMI患者心血管事件发生13例;STEMI患者发生心血管事件71例。发病至就诊时间<3、3~6、6-12和≥12 h的院内病死率分别为3.9%、10.4%、18.2%和23.3%(<0.01),主要心血管事件发生率分别为4.5%、13.3%、19.0%和34.9%(<0.01)。结论:五家渠地区AMI患者药物治疗基本规范化,再灌注治疗比例偏低。院前延迟时间较多,120急救车入院诊治延迟时间明显短于自行入院者。
作者 王健
出处 《农垦医学》 2014年第5期448-451,共4页 Journal of Nongken Medicine
  • 相关文献

参考文献3

二级参考文献24

  • 1陈韵岱,宋现涛,吕树铮,朱华刚,潘伟琦,宁尚秋,康铁朵.12小时内就诊的急性心肌梗死患者治疗现状分析[J].中国介入心脏病学杂志,2005,13(1):5-8. 被引量:67
  • 2中国急性冠状动脉综合征多中心临床研究协作组.中国多省市急性冠状动脉综合征住院患者治疗现状与指南差距分析[J].中华心血管病杂志,2005,33(9):789-792. 被引量:47
  • 3Antman EM, Anbe DT, Arm strong PW, et al, ACC/AHAG uidelines for the management of patients with ST- Elevation myocardial infarction: A report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on practice (committee to Revise the 1999 Guidelines for the Management of patients with acute myocardial infarction) [J]. J Am Coll Cardiol, 2004, 44 (3): El-E211.
  • 4Ellis SG, da Silva ER, Spaulding CM, et al. Review of immediate angioplasty after fibrinolytic therapy for acute myocardial infarction:insights from the RESCUE Ⅰ , RESCUE Ⅱ , and other contemporary clinical experiences [J]. Am Heart J, 2000, 139 (6) : 1046-1053.
  • 5Rogers WJ, Canto JG, Lambrew CT, et al. Temporal trends in the treatment of over 1.5 million patients with myocardial infarction in the US from 1990 through 1999: the National Registry of Myocardial Infarction 1, 2 and 3 [ J]. J Am Coll Cardiol, 2000, 36 (7):2056-2063.
  • 6Eagle KA, Goodman SG, Avezum A, et al. Practice variation and missed opportunities for reperfusion in ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction: findings from the global registry of acute coronary events(GRACE) [J]. Lancet, 2002, 359 (9304): 373-377.
  • 7Wagner S, Schneider S, Schiele R, et al. Acute myocardial infarction in Germany between 1996 and 1998: therapy and intrahospital course. Results of the Myocardial Infarction Registry (MIR) in Germany [J]. Z Kardiol, 1999, 88 (10): 857-867.
  • 8Yusuf S, Mehta SR, Diaz R, et al. Challenges in the conduct of large simple trials of important generic questions in resources-poor settings:the CREATE and ECLA trial program evaluating GIK (glucose, insulin and potassium ) and low-molecular-weight heparin in acute myocardial infarction [J]. Am Heart J, 2004, 1481 (6): 1068-1078.
  • 9The CREATE-ECLA Trial Group Ivestigators. Effect of Glucose-lnsulin-Potassium infusion on mortality in patients with acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction. The CREATE-ECLA Randomized Controlled Trial [J]. JAMA, 2005, 293 (4):437-446.
  • 10MAGIC Steering Committee. Rationale and design of the magnesium in Coronaries (MAGIC) study: a clinical trial to revaluate the efficacy of early administration of magnesium in acute myocardial infarction [J].AmHeartJ, 2000, 139 (lptl): 10-14.

共引文献28

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部