期刊文献+

硬膜外分娩镇痛对剖宫产率及器械助产率的影响 被引量:1

Epidural labor analgesia effect on the rate of cesarean section and Instrument midwifery
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:观察研究硬膜外分娩镇痛对剖宫产率及器械助产率的影响。方法:选取我院2013年1月至2014年12月住院待产的足月单胎初产具备阴道分娩条件的孕妇,按照患者自愿的原则分为两组。观察组宫口开大3cm时行硬膜外分娩镇痛,对照组常规分娩,不行分娩镇痛。结果:观察组剖宫产率为15.3%,其中社会因素剖宫产率为4.20%,对照组剖宫产率为39.9%,其中社会因素剖宫产率为27.3%,;两组间比较差异有统计学意义(<0.05)。观察组产后2小时出血量少于对照组(<0.05)。观察组器械助产率高于对照组(<0.05)。两组新生儿窒息率、新生儿体重比较差异无统计学意义(>0.05)。结论:硬膜外分娩镇痛可降低社会因素和医学指征剖宫产率,增加自然分娩率,增加器械助产率,但可减少产后2小时出血量,不增加新生儿窒息率。 Objective:to observe the epidural labor analgesia and instruments for cesarean delivery rate the influence of the rate of midwifery.Selection Methods:from January 2013 to December 2014 in the hospital for the delivery term of singletons first-timer pregnant women with vaginal delivery conditions, according to the principle of voluntary patients into two groups.Observation group palace mouth up 3 cm: epidural labor analgesia, the control group conventional delivery, no labor analgesia.Results: observation group cesarean delivery rate was 15.3%,in which social factors cesarean delivery rate was 4.20%,the control group the cesarean delivery rate was 39.9%,in which social factors cesarean delivery rate was 27.3%;Comparison between the two groups was statistically significant difference( <0.05).Observation group 2 hours of postpartum haemorrhage amount is less than the control group( <0.05).Observation group equipment midwifery rate is higher than the control group( <0.05).The rate of neonatal asphyxia, neonatal weight compare similar between the two groups has no statistical significance( >0.05).Conclusion:epidural labor analgesia can reduce social factors and medical indications of cesarean section rate, increase the natural births, increase the rate of instrument midwifery, but can reduce the bleeding, postpartum 2 hours does not increase the rate of neonatal asphyxia.
出处 《农垦医学》 2014年第6期504-506,共3页 Journal of Nongken Medicine
关键词 分娩镇痛 剖宫产率 器械助产率 新生儿窒息率 Labor analgesia Cesarean delivery rate Instrument midwifery rate Neonatal asphyxia rate
  • 相关文献

参考文献6

二级参考文献43

  • 1蔡雁,郑建华,王晓燕,姚玉红,董铁军,王丽云.分娩方式对新生儿部分免疫功能的影响[J].中国实用妇科与产科杂志,2005,21(7):440-441. 被引量:50
  • 2梁丽凌.子宫下段高位剖宫产术100例临床分析[J].中国现代医学杂志,2006,16(4):587-588. 被引量:21
  • 3SKUPSKI D W, ABRAMOVITZ S, SAMUELS J, et al. Adverse effects of combined spinal-epidural versus tradi- tional epidural analgesia during labor [ J ]. Int J Gynaecol Obstet, 2009, 106 (3): 242-245.
  • 4ANIM-SOMUAH M, SMYTH R, HOWELL C. Epidural versus non-epidural or no analgesia in labour [ J ]. Cochrane Database Syst Rev, 2005, 19 (4) : CD000331.
  • 5FANNING R A, CAMPION D P, COLLINS C B, et al. A comparison of the inhibitory effects of bupivacaine and levobupivacaine on isolated human pregnant myometrium contractility [ J ] . Anesth Analg, 2008, 107 (4) : 1303-1307.
  • 6TIXIER S, BONNIN M, BOLANDARD F, et al. Continuous patient-controlled epidural infusion of levobupivacaine plus sufentanil in labouring primiparous women: effects of concentration [ J]. Anaesthesia, 2010, 65 (6) : 573-580.
  • 7ARICI G, KARSLI B, KAYACAN N, et al. The effects of bupivacaine, ropivacaine and mepivacaine on the contractility of rat myometrium [ J]. Int J Obstet Anesth, 2004, 13 (2): 95-98.
  • 8BOULIER V, GOMIS P, LAUTNER C, et al. Minimum local analgesic concentrations of ropivacaine and levobupivacaine with sufentanil for epidural analgesia in labour[J]. Int J Obstet Anesth, 2009, 18 (3): 226- 230.
  • 9肖顺贞.护理研究[M].3版.北京:人民卫生出版社,2007:6-8.
  • 10Mac Dorman MF, Menacker F, Declercq E. Cesarean birth in the United States: epidemiology, trends, and outcomes[ J]. Clin Perinatol,2008,35 (2) :293 - 307.

共引文献222

同被引文献4

引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部