延续性护理在呼吸衰竭患者从ICU 转入病房中的应用价值分析

Analysis of the Value of Continuous Nursing in Patients with Respiratory Failure Transferred From ICU to Ward

目的探究呼吸衰竭患者从重症监护室(ICU)转入普通病房实施延续性护理对肺功能及临床症状的影响。方法研究对象选取2017年5月至2018年5月期间在我院治疗的78例呼吸衰竭患者,按随机数表法分成对照组39例与观察组39例,对照组行常规护理,观察组在此基础上行延续性护理,比较两干预前后肺功能[用力肺活量(FCV)、1s用力呼气容积(FEV1)、1s用力呼气容积与用力肺活量比值(FEV1/FCV)]及干预后症状自评量表(SCL-90)评分、焦虑自评量表(SAS)与抑郁自评量表(SDS)评分。结果相比对照组,观察组干预后FCV、FEV1、FEV1/FCV均较高,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);相比对照组,观察组干预后SCL-90、SAS、SDS评分均较低,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论呼吸衰竭患者从ICU转入病房中实施延续性护理可改善患者临床症状,缓解负性情绪,提高肺功能。

Objective To investigate the effects of continuous nursing care on pulmonary function and clinical symptoms of respiratory failure patients from intensive care unit(ICU)to general ward.Methods Seventy-eight patients with respiratory failure who were treated in our hospital from May 2017 to May 2018 were randomly divided into control group(39 cases)and observation group(39 cases).On this basis,continuous nursing was performed in the observation group.Lung function[forced vital capacity(FCV),1 s forced expiratory volume(FEV1),forced expiratory volume/forced vital capacity ratio(FEV1)]before and after two interventions were compared(P<0.05).FEV1/FCV]and symptom Checklist(SCL-90),(SAS)and(SDS)after intervention.Results Compared with the control group,the FCV,FEV1,FEV1/FCV of the observation group was higher than that of the control group(P<0.05).Compared With the control group,the SCL-90,SAS,SDS score of the observation group was lower than that of the control group(P<0.05).Conclusion Continuous nursing from ICU to ward can improve clinical symptoms and relieve negative emotion in patients with respiratory failure.To improve lung function.