梁启超与康德“趣味”说之比较

A Comparison between Kants and Liang Qichao's Views of Taste

“趣味”在梁启超和康德的美学思想中占有极重要的地位。本文从趣味的规定、趣味与情感、趣味与目的等几个方面来比较他们的“趣味”说,可以发现:梁启超对趣味、情感的理解是经验性的,而康德则强调趣味的先验特征和快感的纯粹性,但在趣味与目的的关系上,他们都持有类似的矛盾态度。实际上,趣味与目的的关系问题只是在形而上学美学的维度之内才能成立。

Taste is important to the aesthetic thought of Kant and Liangqichang. This article tries to compare two thinkers views of taste from aspects of the determination of taste and the relation of tast-e to feeling and end . By comparison,we draw a conclusion that Liang qichao's understanding of taste and feeling is empirical, Kant however emphsized the transcendental quality of taste and the pureness of pleasure. But they showed the same contradictory attitude to the relation between taste and end. In fact,the problem of the relation of taste and end is possible only in the horizon of matephysical aesthetics.