期刊文献+

中美大学生篮球联赛赛制的比较研究 被引量:10

A comparative study of the Chinese and America collegiate basketball league system
下载PDF
导出
摘要 与NCAA联赛相比 ,CUBA联赛的基层预赛所普遍采用的赛会制时间跨度短、比赛场次少 ,同时剥夺了多数院校的主场机会 ,未能真正体现基层预赛作为联赛基础的重要性 ;CUBA联赛分区赛存在名额太少、各分区缺乏交流的机会以及强队过于集中等缺陷 ,制约着联赛的深入开展 ,而NCAA64强赛赛制科学、合理 ,为各队提供了公平竞争的机会。建议借鉴NCAA联赛的经验 。 Compared with NCAA,the period between the regular season games of CUBA is shorter. And there are less games. Therefore,most institutes or universities do not have a chance to host the games. It is hard to demonstrate the importance of the regular season games as the basis for the leagues. For CUBA regional games,the mumber of teams is not enough. Moreover,the exchanges between the teams are scarce. And sometimes there are too many strong teams in the regional games. As for NCAA64,it is more scientific and reasonable and can give equal chance to every team. The CUBA league system should be reformed in view of the experiences of NCAA.
作者 孙义良
机构地区 武汉体育学院
出处 《体育成人教育学刊》 2003年第2期19-21,共3页 Journal of Sports Adult Education
关键词 中国 美国 大学生篮球联赛 赛制 比较研究 NCAA CUBA 分区赛 CUBA NCAA league system college students basketball league comparative study
  • 相关文献

参考文献1

  • 1中国大学生篮球联赛组委会.中国大学生篮球联赛竞赛规程[Z].北京:中国大学生篮球联赛组委会,2000..

同被引文献39

引证文献10

二级引证文献62

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部