摘要
目的 :评价Cohen Mansfield激越问卷 (CMAI)的信度和效度。 方法 :对 5 1例老年精神科病房住院的痴呆和非痴呆患者 ,先由 2名评定员用CMAI同时评定 12名患者 ,再同时评定CMAI和老年临床评定量表 (SCAG) ,1周后重测CMAI。对两评定员的一致性 ,量表的分半相关 ,重测信度及与SCAG的平行效度进行分析。 结果 :CMAI的Cronbach’sα系数为 0 814 ,两评定员一致性相关系数为 0 731。 2次评定量表的相关系数为 0 977。量表总分与SCAG的相关系数为 0 732。 结论
Objective:To assess the reliability and validity of the Cohen Mansfield agitation inventory (CMAI). Method:Two doctors used CMAI to assess 12 patients for realizing the observe concordance;51 dementia patients and non dementia patients were evaluated with CMAI and sandoz clinical assessment geriatric (SCAG),then tested with CMAI again one week later.The observe concordance of the two doctors,the split correction of the scale,test retest reliability and parallel validity for SCAG were analyzed. Results:The coefficient of inter item consistency (Cronbach's α),the concordance of the two doctors,the coefficient of the two raters were 0 814,0 731 and 0 977 respectively.The parallel validity for SCAG was 0 732. Conclusion:CMAI has good reliability and validity.
出处
《临床精神医学杂志》
2003年第3期145-146,共2页
Journal of Clinical Psychiatry
关键词
老年期痴呆
评定量表
信度
效度
Elder dementia
Rating scale
Reliability
Validity
