期刊文献+

一个基于并行集团的系统级故障概率诊断算法

An System-Level Fault Probabilistic Diagnosis Algorithm Based on Parallel Group
下载PDF
导出
摘要 概率诊断算法是系统级故障诊断研究的一个重要方面 ,本文提出了一种基于并行集团的概率诊断算法 PGSFPD算法 ,并设计了一个系统级故障诊断软件仿真系统 ,对诊断算法进行仿真 ,分析比较各算法的性能 ,仿真结果表明PGSFPD算法性能优于经典的概率诊断算法 Somani&Agrawal算法 ,可在只需较少测试数的情况下 ,在保持很高诊断正确率的同时 。 Consider a system composed of N nodes that can be faulty or fault free.The purpose of system level fault diagnosis is to have each fault free node determine the state of all nodes of the system.Probabilistic diagnosis algorithm is very important in the system level fault diagnosis research.A system level fault probabilistic diagnosis algorithm based on parallel group was proposed,PGSFPD algorithm,and the software emulation system of system level fault diagnosis was presented.Experimental results are given through simulation of the algorithm for large systems of from 200 nodes to 1000 nodes under the emulation system.The results indicate the PGSFPD algorithm has better performance than the Somani & Agrawal algorithm,which is a classic probabilistic algorithm in system level fault diagnosis.
出处 《电子学报》 EI CAS CSCD 北大核心 2003年第2期180-182,共3页 Acta Electronica Sinica
基金 国家自然科学基金 (No .699730 1 6) 广东省自然科学基金 (No.0 1 0 4 75)
关键词 系统级故障诊断 集团 概率诊断 诊断算法 软件仿真 system level fault diagnosis node grouping probabilistic diagnosis diagnosis algorithm software emulation
  • 相关文献

参考文献10

  • 1F P Preparata, et al. On the connection assignment problem of diagnosable systems[ J ]. IEEE Trans, 1967, COMP-16(12) :848 - 854.
  • 2M Bearden, R Bianchini. Efficient and fault-tolerant distributed host monitoring using system-level diagnosis[A]. Proceedings of the IFIP/IEEE International Conference on Distributed Platforms: Client/Server and Beyond [ C ]. Dresden, Germany: IFIP, 1996.159 - 172.
  • 3Stefano Chessa, Paolo Santi. Comparison-based system-level fault diagnosis in Ad-Hoc networks[ A]. Proceedings of the Symposium on Reliable and Distributed Systems [ C ]. New Orleans: SRDS, 2001.28 - 31.
  • 4Douglas M Blough, Hongying W Brown. The broadcast comparison model for on-line fault diagnosis in multicomputer systems: theory and implementation[ J]. IEEE Trans, 1999, COMP--48(5) :470-493.
  • 5Evangelos Kranakis, Andrzej Pelc. Better adaptive diagnosis of hypercubes[J], IEEE Trans, 2000, COMP-49(10) : 1013 - 1020.
  • 6Elias procopio Duarte Jr, Takashi Nanya. A hierarchical adaptive distributed system-level diagnosis algorithm [J].IEEE Trans, 1998,COMP-47 ( 1 ) : 34 - 45.
  • 7Hsien-Sheng Hsiao, et al. Reaching fault diagnosis agreement under a hybrid fault model[ J]. IEEE Trans,2000, COMP-49(9) :980 - 986.
  • 8A K Somani, V K Agrawal. Diagnosis algorithms for regular interconnected structures [ J ]. IEEE Tram, 1992, COMP-41 (5) :899 - 906.
  • 9Krzysztof Kiks, Andrzej Pelc. Globally optimal diagnosis in system with random faults[J]. IEEE Trans, 1997. COMP-46(2) ,200-204.
  • 10张大方,谢高岗,闵应骅.Node Grouping in System-Level Fault Diagnosis[J].Journal of Computer Science & Technology,2001,16(5):474-479. 被引量:3

二级参考文献2

  • 1Chen T H,Fault Diagnosis and Fault Tolerance: A Systematic Approach to Special Topics,1992年
  • 2Preparata F P,IEEE Trans Electronic Computen,1967年,16卷,12期,848页

共引文献2

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部