期刊文献+

外科治疗对晚期乳腺癌骨转移患者生活质量的影响 被引量:5

Estimation of surgical treatment on the quality of life in late-stage breast cancer patients with bone metastasis
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的探讨乳腺癌晚期骨转移的外科治疗对患者生活质量的影响。方法1988-04/2001-03,56例有随访结果的乳腺癌骨转移患者行Guy's疼痛分级和Karnofsky评分,测量X线平片中长骨骨皮质破坏厚度(或椎体骨折塌陷的程度)作为定量计算指标。依据全身状况和骨转移灶特征将患者分为手术组与非手术组。对比两组临床缓解率、Karnofsky及生活质量评分结果并作统计学分析。结果平均随访19.5个月。56例患者中42例接受手术治疗,总有效率83%,明显高于非手术组57%。17例有病理骨折或骨折危险性的患者接受大段异体骨关节移植,依据Mankin's异体骨移植评价标准,术后总评优良率为88%。接受手术治疗与未行手术治疗的患者相比,疼痛减轻,Karnofsky评分增加,生活质量明显提高。结论根据骨转移癌分组标准进行有选择性的手术治疗可以提高患者终末期的生活质量和生命活力。 Aim To study the effect of surgical treatment on the quality of life for late stage breast cancer patients with bone metastasis.Methods 56 inpatients were divided into two groups:operation group with 42 patients and non operartion group with 14 patients according to their general condition and bone metastasis stigmata.42 patients in operation group were treated with surgical treatment while the others not.Clinical remission rate, Karnofsky and quality of life were tested in two groups.Results All patients were assessed and followed up for a mean course of 19.5 months in average. The efficiency in operation group(83%)was higher than that in non operation(57%).The eximious rate of 17 patients treated with allografts was 88%according to Mankin. Karnofsky score was increased and quality of life was enhanced in operation group after surgical treatment, compared with non operation group.Conclusion Positive and moderate treatments including operation may enhance patients' quality of life and play an important role in medical practice.
出处 《中国临床康复》 CSCD 2003年第11期1674-1675,共2页 Chinese Journal of Clinical Rehabilitation
关键词 外科治疗 晚期乳腺癌 骨转移 生活质量 疼痛 X线平片 长骨骨皮质破坏厚度 手术 breast neoplasms neoplasm metastasis pain measurement surgical procedures,operative bone transplantation
  • 相关文献

参考文献1

二级参考文献2

  • 1徐震雷,张苏范,王颖,张冀岗,洪韵琳.乳腺癌患者个性特点研究[J].中国心理卫生杂志,1995,9(4):169-170. 被引量:27
  • 2严和亲 沈渔村.心理生理障碍与心身疾病.精神病学(第2版)[M].北京:人民卫生出版社,1997.726.

共引文献39

同被引文献22

  • 1徐国柱,蔡志基.镇痛药临床评价方法研究[J].中国新药杂志,1995,4(4):20-22. 被引量:256
  • 2[1]Simonton SS, Sherman AC. Psychological aspects of mind-body medicine:promises and pitfalls from research with cancer patients. Altern Ther Health Med1998; 4(4): 50 - 8, 60, 62 - 4
  • 3[2]Sobin LH, Fleming ID. TNM Classification of Malignant Tumors, fifth edition (1997) . Union Internationale Contre le Cancer and the American Joint Committee on Cancer. Cancer 1997; 80:1803 -4
  • 4[3]Brady MJ, Cella DF, Mo F, et al. Reliability and validity of the Functional Assessment of cancer: Therapy-Breast Quality of Life Instrument. J Clin Oncol 1997;15 (3 ): 974 - 86
  • 5[8]Cole BF, Geber RD, Anderson KM. Parametric approaches to quality-adjsted suvial analysis. Biometrtcs 1994; 50(3): 621
  • 6[8]Zcch DF,Lch man KA,Graond SA.A new treatment option for Chronic Cancer Pain.Eur J Pain Cure 1994;1(1):26
  • 7[3]Ware JE Jr,Sherbourne CD.The MOS 36-item Short-Form Health Survey(SF-36).L Conceptual framework and item selection.Med Care 1992;30(6):473-83
  • 8[4]Rubens,Fogelmen.Bone Metastases//Langlais F,Tomeno B.Limb Salvage.Major Reconstruction in Oncologic and Nontumoral Conditions.New York:Springer 1991:121-42
  • 9Rubens,Fogelmen.Bone metastases.In:Langlais F,Tomeno B.Limb salvage.Major reconstruction in ocologic and nontumoral conditions[M].New York:Springer,1991.121-142.
  • 10Diel IJ,Body JJ,Lichinitser MR,et al.Improved quality of life after long-term treatment with the bisphosphonate in patients with metastatic bone disease due to breast cancer[J].Eur J Cancer,2004,40(11):1704-1712.

引证文献5

二级引证文献16

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部