期刊文献+

布洛芬混悬液口服与安乃近滴鼻对小儿发热的疗效比较 被引量:5

Clinic observation of the effect of oral brufen suspension and analgin naristillae on children with fever
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:比较布洛芬混悬液口服与安乃近注射液滴鼻对高热惠儿的退热疗效。方法:对151例体温>38.5℃的急性上呼吸道感染患儿随机分为布洛芬治疗组和安乃近对照组进行比较性研究。结果:治疗组与对照组退热起效时间无显著性差异,但在48 h和72 h退热疗效上有显著性差异。结论:布洛芬组退热疗效好,退热作用持续时间长,不失为儿科临床基本退热药物之一。 Objective: To observe the effect of oral brufen suspension and analgin naristillae on children with fever. Methods: 151 case with fever( > 38 ℃ ) due to upper respiratory tract infection, were random divided into brufen treating group and analgin control group. Result: There was not any different between two groups at the time when the body temperature started going down. But there were significantly different effects after 48 h or 72 h in reducing the temperature. Conclusion: Brufen suspension can be taken as basic drug in treating children with fever, for it has better and longer effect in reducing fever.
作者 黄舒 徐春蓉
出处 《儿科药学杂志》 CAS 2003年第3期50-51,共2页 Journal of Pediatric Pharmacy
关键词 布洛芬混悬液 安乃近 口服 滴鼻 发热 疗效 儿童 Brufen Analgin Fever Children
  • 相关文献

参考文献2

二级参考文献2

  • 1陈修.心血管药理学[M].北京:人民卫生出版社,1986.427.
  • 2中国药学院杂志编辑部.新药手册[M].天津:天津科学技术出版社,1991.244.

共引文献25

同被引文献13

引证文献5

二级引证文献40

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部