期刊文献+

中美社会科课程标准比较研究(下) 被引量:3

Comparative study on curriculum standard for Social Studies of China and America
下载PDF
导出
摘要 In America, National Council For The Social Studies (NCSS) developed and published Curriculum Standards for Social Studies: Expectations of Excellence in 1994, and most of the states’ department of education published their curriculum standards for Social Studies, too. The Commonwealth of Massachusetts Department of Education published History and Social Science Curriculum Framework, In China, the Department of Education formulated and published History~Social Studies Curriculum Standard in 2001. By comparing, we can research the characteristic of Social Studies Standard of China and America. Moreover, by studying the value and the purpose of Social Studies, multicultural in Social Studies, and the relationship of the Social Studies Standard to other standards in the field, we can discover some general ideas. In America, National Council For The Social Studies (NCSS) developed and published Curriculum Standards for Social Studies: Expectations of Excellence in 1994, and most of the states' department of education published their curriculum standards for Social Studies, too. The Commonwealth of Massachusetts Department of Education published History and Social Science Curriculum Framework, In China, the Department of Education formulated and published History~Social Studies Curriculum Standard in 2001. By comparing, we can research the characteristic of Social Studies Standard of China and America. Moreover, by studying the value and the purpose of Social Studies, multicultural in Social Studies, and the relationship of the Social Studies Standard to other standards in the field, we can discover some general ideas.
作者 李稚勇
出处 《学科教育》 北大核心 2003年第6期44-48,F003,共6页 Journal of Subject Education
关键词 美国 中国 课程标准 比较教育 社会科课程 课程结构 分类目标 Social Studies curriculum standard curriculum organization multicultural
  • 相关文献

参考文献15

  • 1[德]施密特著.全球化与道德重建[M].北京:社会科学文献出版社,2001..
  • 2台湾地区“教育部”人文及社会学科教育指导委员会主编.《英国小学社会科课程之分析》[M].三民书局,1992年版.第2—5页.
  • 3陈丽华.《美国的社会科课程》.载“九年一贯社会科课程之改革趋势”(台湾地区)[J].教育研究,1998,(8).
  • 4中华人民共和国教育部制订.《历史与社会课程标准》(一)、(二)[M].北京:北京师范大学出版社,2001..
  • 5Francis Wardle, Children of Mixed Race--No Longer Invisible, Educational Leadership, December 1999 / January 2000.
  • 6Rita Dunn, The Goals and Track Record of Multicultural Education, Educational Leadership, April 1997.
  • 7Andrew C. Porter, National Standards and School Improvement in the 1990s: Issues and Promise, American Journal of Education 102 (August 1994), 421-447.
  • 8Linda Darling - Hammond, National Standards and Assessments: Will They Improve Education? American Journal of Education 102 (August 1994), 478-507.
  • 9Lorretta Sullivan Lobes, Surveying State Standards: National History Education Network's 1997 Reporton State Social Studies Standards, The History Teacher, February 1998.
  • 10Loretta Sullivan Lobes, Surveying State Standards: National History Education Network's 1997 Report on State Social Studies Standards, The History Teacher, February 1998.

共引文献1

同被引文献44

引证文献3

二级引证文献12

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部