期刊文献+

移植肾排异彩色多普勒血流显像与肾穿刺活检的对照研究 被引量:2

Color doppler flow image to detect acute rejection episodes compared with biopsies
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的 分析彩色多普勒血流显像 (CDFI)与肾活检在移植肾排异中的作用 ,评估无创性CDFI对移植肾术后的诊断价值。方法 对 5 9例肾移植术后患者行CDFI检查并参照病理诊断 ,对二维图像、彩色血流图、血流频谱及阻力指数 (RI)、搏动指数 (PI)、收缩期与舒张期血流速度比 (S/D)等参数进行分析。结果 急性排异组的RI值为0 .77± 0 .0 5 ,PI值为 1.4 7± 0 .33,S/D为 4 .0 1± 1.33;慢性排异组的RI值为 0 .72± 0 .0 7,PI值为 1.2 2± 0 .5 1,S/D为 2 .90± 1.0 1,两组RI值、PI值、S/D明显高于正常组 (RI值 0 .5 7± 0 .0 7;PI值 0 .87± 0 .2 8;S/D为 2 .33± 0 .4 2 )。手术后早期急性排异患者CDFI可靠评价移植肾低灌注 ,RI <0 .72。结论 CDFI监测移植肾后的排异反应快速 ,准确无创 。 Objective To evaluate Color Doppler Flow Image (CDFI) in diagnosis of early stage in acute renal allograft rejection, compared with biopsies. Methods We studied a total of 59 patients, who were all subjected to CDFI and biopsies in the postoperative period. The two dimension gray scale picture, spectrogram, perfusion index (PI), resistant index (RI), the ratio of blood flowing velocity of systole period and diastole period (S/D) as correlated to the findings of biopsies were reviewed. Results The dynamic observations on CDFI showed that in acute rejection group the RI, PI and S/D values 0.77±0.05, 1.47±0.33 and 4.01±1.33, respectively, while in chronic rejection group values 0.72±0.07, 1.22±0.51 and 2.90±1.01. The two groups were both obviously higer than those for the normal 0.57±0.07, 0.87±0.28 and 2.33±0.42, respectively. CDFI can be a reliable method to diagnosis the poor perfusion on the early stage of postoperative period with the criteria of RI< 0.72 . Conclusion as a fast accurate non invasive technique, CDFI can be used to find the acute rejection.
出处 《西安交通大学学报(医学版)》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2003年第3期277-279,共3页 Journal of Xi’an Jiaotong University(Medical Sciences)
关键词 彩色多普勒血流显像 肾穿刺活检 排异反应 肾移植 终末期肾脏疾病 诊断 color doppler flow image renal graft rejection biopsy
  • 相关文献

参考文献7

共引文献20

同被引文献24

  • 1丁生珍,邓又斌,杨惠兰.彩色多普勒血流显像及多普勒能量图在移植肾排斥反应中的应用[J].中华器官移植杂志,2005,26(8):464-466. 被引量:16
  • 2Racusen LC,Solez K,Colvin RB,et al.The Banff 97 working classification of renal allograft pathology.Kidney Int,1999,55(2):713-723.
  • 3Racusen LC,Colvin RB,Solez K,et al.Antibody-mediated rejection criteria-an addition to the Banff 97 classification of renal allograft refection.Am J Transplant,2003,3(6):708-714.
  • 4黄受方.肾移植病理学//夏同礼.现代泌尿病理学.北京:人民卫生出版社,2002:67-93.
  • 5章友康.泌尿系统疾病/叶任高.内科学.5版.北京:人民卫生出版社,2000:513-520.
  • 6Racusen LC, Solez K, Colvin RB, et al. The Banff 97 working classification of renal allograft pathology. Kidney International, 1999,55 (2) : 713-723.
  • 7Nilsson A, Loren I,Persson NH. Color Doppler energy:detection of hypoperfused areas in renal transplants. J Ultrasound Med, 1998,17(3) : 153-155.
  • 8Sidhu MK, Gambhir S,Jefrey RBJ. Power Doppler imaging of acute renal transplant rejection. J Clin Ultrasound, 1999,27(4) : 171-175.
  • 9Merkus JWS, van Asten WNJC, Hoitsma AJ, et al. Doppler spectrum analysis in the differential diagnosis of renal transplant dysfunction. Clin Transpl, 1996,10 (5) : 420-428.
  • 10Gaschen L, Schuurman HJ. Contribution of Power Doppler Sonography to the detection of renal allograft rejection in the cynomolgus monkey. Invest Radiol, 2001, 36:335-340.

引证文献2

二级引证文献3

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部