期刊文献+

国际刑事法院可受理性之解释及其评析

原文传递
导出
摘要 法院在达致相同的解释目标时采用了不同的解释规则和方法,对规约第19(4)条中"审判开始"做出两种解释:"审判分庭组成时"和"开庭陈述进行时"。与前者相比,"开庭陈述进行时"这一解释更有利于维护法院中立裁决方的角色以及经济司法原则。规约第17(2)和(3)条的"不愿意"和"不能够"是法院补充性管辖权判断的实质标准,其判断必须基于有关可受理性质疑的诉讼程序进行时存在的事实。考虑到缔约方意图,"国家向国际刑事法院提交情势"应当定性为第17(3)条的"不能够",而非第17(2)条的"不愿意"。规约没有规定因"滥用程序"本身而终止诉讼这一程序。基于"严重违反人权"的"滥用程序"可以作为终止诉讼的原因,但要求对"程序"的克减满足"严重违反个人人权达到审判结果是无法接受"的程度。这体现出法院"重实质轻形式"的裁量倾向。
作者 于南
出处 《刑法论丛》 CSSCI 2015年第4期547-577,共31页 Criminal Law Review
基金 2013年上海高校青年教师培养资助计划“国际刑事法院司法运作效率及其影响实证研究”(项目编号:Z2H213014)的阶段性成果
  • 相关文献

参考文献27

  • 1Pre-Trial Chamber II,Decision on the Application by the Govern-ment of Kenya Challenging the Admissibility of the Case Pursuant to Article 19 (2) (b)of the Statute. ICC-01/09-02/11 . 2011
  • 2Salini Construtorri SpA and Italstrade SpA v Morocco. ICSID Case No ARB/ 00/ 4 .
  • 3Trial Chamber II.Reasons for the Oral Decision on the Motion Challenging the Admissibility of the Case (Article19of the Statute). ICC-01/04-01/07 . 2009
  • 4Pre-Trial Chamber II, Decision on the Application by the Government of Kenya Challenging the Admissibility ofthe Case Pursuant to Article19 (2) (b) of the Statute. No.: ICC-01/09-02/11 . 2011
  • 5Pre-Trial Chamber II, Decision on the Application by theGovernment of Kenya Challenging the Admissibility of the Case Pursuant to Article19 (2) (b) of the Statute. No.:ICC-01/09-02/11 . 2011
  • 6Reply on behalf of the Govemment of Kenya to the Responses of the Prosecutor, Defence, and OPCV to theGovernment’’s Application pursuant to Article19of the Rome Statute. No.:ICC-01/09-02/11-91 . 2011
  • 7Pre-Trial Chamber II, Decision on the Application by the Government of Kenya Challenging the Admissibility ofthe Case Pursuant to Article19(2)(b) of the Statute. No.: ICC-01/09-02/11 . 2011
  • 8Pre-Trial Chamber II, Decision on the Application by the Government ofKenya Challenging the Admissibility of the Case Pursuant to Article19 (2) (b) of theStatute. No.: ICC-01/09-02/11 . 2011
  • 9Pre-Trial Chamber II,'Decision Pursuant to Article15of the Rome Statuteon the Authorization of an Investigation into the Situation in the Republic of Kenya'. No.: ICC-01/09-19-Corr . 2010
  • 10Trial Chamber I, Decision on the status before the Trial Chamber of the evidence heard by the Pre-TrialChamber and the decisions of the Pre-Trial Chamber in trial proceedings, and the manner in which evidence shallbe submitted. No.: ICC-01/04-01/06-1084 . 2007

共引文献3

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部