摘要
目的 设计一套汉语语法检查量表 (ChineseAgrammatismBattery ,CAB)并测试其信度和效度。方法 对 4 6名脑部疾病患者及 4 6例健康受试者进行了CAB测试 ,计算失语法指数 (agrammatism quotient,AgQ) ,并与汉语标准化失语检查法 (aphasiabatteryofChinese ,ABC)对比。计算检查者间、检查者内及复测相关系数。结果 左、右大脑半球病变组及对照组CAB各亚项量表分的平均数差异极显著 (F =4 .5 0～18.5 7,P <0 .0 5 )。左大脑半球病变组各个亚项量表分平均成绩均明显低于右大脑半球病变组 (q =5 .6 3～9.6 7,P <0 .0 5 )与健康对照组 (q =7.5 0～ 9.6 1,P <0 .0 1)。量表的复测信度、检查者间信度、检查者内信度均较好 (r =0 .991～ 0 .999,P <0 .0 1)。CAB法的AgQ与ABC法各指标间呈显著正相关 (r =0 .92 8～ 0 .979,P <0 .0 1)。结论 CAB具备较好的信度和效度 ,可以作为定量评定汉语失语症患者语法障碍的工具。
Objective To develop a Chinese agrammatism battery and to test its reliability and validity.Methods 46 cases of cerebral-lesioned patients and 46 healthy subjects were examined and the rating scores were recorded. The test-retest、 intra-rater and inter-rater reliability were analyzed by using Pearson correlation. Correlationships between AgQ of CAB and aphasia quotient (AQ)、 Performance Quotient (PQ) and Cortical Quotient (CQ) of ABC were investigated.Results The difference of rating subscores among left and right hemiphere-lesioned patients and healthy subjects were significant (F= 4.50～ 18.57, P< 0.05). The rating subscores in left hemisphere-lesioned patients were significantly lower than that of right hemisphere-lesioned patients (P< 0.05) and healthy subjects (P< 0.01). The reliability of test-retest、 the intra-rater and the inter-rater were good (r= 0.991～ 0.999, P< 0.01). Significant correlations were found between AgQ and AQ、 PQ and CQ of ABC (r= 0.928～ 0.979, P< 0.01)Conclusions The CAB has good reliability and validity. It can be used as a tool for evaluating the degree of agrammatism of Chinese aphasia patients.
出处
《卒中与神经疾病》
2003年第3期152-154,共3页
Stroke and Nervous Diseases
基金
湖北省自然科学基金资助项目 (编号 2 0 0 0J0 69)
