期刊文献+

舵面损伤在线故障模式预测及故障检测 被引量:10

On-Line Fault Mode Prediction and Fault Detection for Control Surface Damage
下载PDF
导出
摘要 舵面损伤的传统模型匹配检测方法只适用于线性气动模型 ,并且故障检测和定位能力受操纵和机动状态影响很大。产生这些问题的原因是在故障模式预测和故障检测中忽略了一些实时飞行状态和参数变化。文中将传统的离线故障模式预测改为在线计算 ,在计算中引入实时飞行状态及参数 ,并且在使用解析余度估算正常飞机运动时 ,考虑了实时飞行状态、舵面偏转、质量、惯量等参数变化 ,由实时估算值与实测值比较获得残差。此外 ,采用了故障模式空间最优方向匹配法进行故障隔离以减小残差决策的计算量。对所建立的新算法可以不使用任何简化、假定。使用某机舵面损伤非线性数据进行了分析和仿真 ,结果表明该方法可以适用于多种故障气动模型 ,而且不受机动状态。 The traditional fault detection and isolation (FDI) algorithm in self-repair flight control system for control surface damage is constantly criticized for its limited applicability. The FDI algorithm needs to be improved for different aerodynamic models, control inputs and maneuvering states. Simplifications and assumptions during FDI fault mode calculations cause its limited applicability. We propose to eliminate these simplifications and assumptions by taking four measures: (1) predicting the fault mode on-line with real-time flight state and parameters; (2) estimating the normal aircraft movement by analytical redundancy using real-time maneuvering state, aerosurface deflection and aircraft parameters; (3) obtaining the residual by comparing the measured aircraft movement, which may contain fault message; (4) in order to reduce the computing requirement, using a best-direction matching in fault mode vector space for fault isolation. Analysis and simulation of the nonlinear fault aerodynamic data prove that the new method can work with various aerodynamic models without limitation on flight status and controls, thus satisfying the requirements of engineering applications.
出处 《西北工业大学学报》 EI CAS CSCD 北大核心 2003年第3期298-301,共4页 Journal of Northwestern Polytechnical University
基金 航空科学基金 (99E5 30 4 6 )
关键词 自修复飞控系统 故障检测及诊断 故障模式预测 Accident prevention Algorithms Online systems
  • 相关文献

参考文献8

  • 1ETKINB 何植岱等译.大气飞行动力学[M].北京:科学出版社,1979..
  • 2Weiss J L, Willsky A S. Looze D P, et al, Detection and Isolation of Control Surface Effectiveness Failures in High Performance Aircraft. IEEE NAECON, 1985:552~559.
  • 3Huang C Y, Stengel R F. Failure Model Determination in a Knowledge-Based Control System. Proc of American Control Conference, 1987, 1643~1649.
  • 4Frank P M. Fault Diagnosis in Dynamic Systems Using Analytical and Knowledge-Based Redundancy--A Survey and Some New Results. Automatica, 1990, 26(3).
  • 5Thomas B W. Development of an Adaptive Failure-Detection and Identification System for Detecting Aircraft Control-Element Failure. NASA TP-3051, 1991.
  • 6Urnes J M, Yeager R B. Flight Demonstration of the Self-Repairing Flight Control System in a NASA F-15 Aircraft.AIAA 91-3106, 1991.
  • 7Eslinger R A, Chandler P R. Self-Repairing Flight Control System Program Overview. IEEE NAECON, 1988, 504~511.
  • 8Aallen S M, Caglayan A K. An Expert System Approach to Global Fault Detection and Isolation Design.WL-TR-91-3007, 1989.

共引文献1

同被引文献48

引证文献10

二级引证文献47

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部