唯物史观的历史命运——关于马克思主义文本解读的思考

Historical Destiny of Materialist Conception of History ——Reflections on the Interpretation of Texts of Marxism

一个多世纪以来 ,马克思主义的传承和演化 ,都有其内在“文本”的原因与外在“解读”的动力。唯物史观之具有大限度的真理性与合理性 ,根本在于其最高原则与精神 ,即物质的统一性、发展演化的辩证性、人的主体性。它关于人类社会发展演化的模式彻底贯彻了上述原则 ,且具有基本概念上的合理抽象性与架构上的立体性、兼容性与张力。马克思主义理论及其唯物史观又是一个开放的理论系统。在新的世纪 。

The transmission and evolution of Marxism over the past more than one hundred years have been propelled by its texts and their interpretation. The maximum truth and rationality of the materialist conception of history lie in its highest principles and spirit: material unity, dialectics of development and evolution and human subjectivity. Its model of development and evolution of human society is imbued with the above principles and incorporates the rationalness of its basic concepts and the three dimensionality, compatibility and tensions of its framework. Furthermore, the Marxist doctrine and its materialist conception of history are an open theoretical system. In the new century this conception will be still full of vigor and remain one of the mainstream trends of thought. $$$$ Liuyan (流言,gossip) and Eyan (讹言, wild talk, raving) in the Han Dynasty $$$$ Lü Zongli Rumour ( yaoyan 谣言) has been a remarkable cultural and social feature of Chinese history. Offering an expressive outlet for peoples anxieties and anger, it was often linked with social tensions, social conflict and crisis. The liuyan and eyan of the Han dynasty were rumor like discourses and not, as is commonly believed, “groundless and fabricated stories and news.” Careful study of such discourses yields rich and comprehensive illustration and understanding of the social and psychological atmosphere of the period, as well as fuller interpretation of the historical truth of such “gossiping and raving” and its relation to specific historical contexts.