期刊文献+

后退式旋切导管对冠状动脉支架内再狭窄的治疗

Pullback atherectomy for the treatment of in-stent restenosis: Clinical experience and follow-up angiography
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的 :评价后退式旋切导管 (PAC)治疗冠状动脉支架内再狭窄病变的有效性和安全性以及其即刻和近期定量冠状动脉造影结果。方法 :17例支架内再狭窄病变采用PAC治疗 ,应用定量冠状动脉造影评价即刻和近期疗效 ,并与同期的 38例首次介入治疗病变进行比较。结果 :支架内再狭窄组与首次介入治疗组相比PAC器械成功率分别为 10 0 %∶92 %、即刻造影残余狭窄率为 (36± 10 ) %∶(35± 15 ) %、斑块组织获取率为 94 %∶94 % ,两组差异无显著性意义 (P >0 .0 5 )。PAC所产生的血管腔直径增益为 (0 .78± 0 .6 6 )mm ,略低于首次介入治疗者〔(0 .97± 0 .5 5 )mm〕。PAC造成的主要并发症包括原置入支架带出 2例 ,血管内膜撕裂 3例。 6个月随访造影血管腔直径丢失指数为 0 .4 6± 0 .4 5 ,略低于首次介入治疗组 (0 .5 7± 1.13)。造影再狭窄率为 2 9% ,与首次介入治疗组相近 (2 6 % )。结论 :PAC能有效地用于冠状动脉支架内再狭窄病变的处理 ,具有较理想的即刻和近期有效率。 Objective:To evaluate the preliminary clinical experience and early angiographic outcome of pullback atherectomy device in the treatment of in stent restenosis.Methods:Seventeen patients with in stent restenosis lesion were treated with pullback atherectomy device, 38 De novo lesion were compared. Quantitative coronary angiography data was obtained before and after the intervention, and follow up angiography at 6 months.Results:The device success rate were 100% for in stent restenosis lesion and 92% for De novo lesion . The minimal luminal diameter (MLD) gain were ( 0.78 ± 0.66 ) mm for in stent restenosis lesion and ( 0.97 ± 0.55 ) mm for denovo lesion. Angiographic complications after atherectomy for in stent restenosis lesion included vascular dissection in 3 patients and primary stent taken out in 2 patients. The mean lumen loss was ( 0.46 ± 0.45 ) mm, with a binary angiographic restenosis rate of 29% in follow up angiography at 6 manths for the in stent restenosis lesion.Conclusion:Pullback atherectomy seems to be an effective and safety means of plaque removal for coronary in stent restenosis lesion.
出处 《临床心血管病杂志》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2003年第7期389-391,共3页 Journal of Clinical Cardiology
关键词 心脏导管插入术 斑块去除术 后退式 冠状血管造影术 支架 再狭窄 Catheterization, heart Pullback atherectomy Coronary angiography Stent Restenosis
  • 相关文献

参考文献10

  • 1Maeander P J, Roubin O S, Agrawal S K, et al. Balloon angioplasty for treatment of in-stent restenosis:Feasibility, safety, and efficacy. Cathet Cardiovase Diagn, 1994, 32:125--131.
  • 2Eltachaninoff H, Koning R, Tron C, et al. Balloon angioplasty for the treatment of coronary in-stent restenosis:Immediate results and 6-month angiographic recurrent restenosis rate. J Am Coil Cardiol, 1998, 32:980--984.
  • 3Bossi I, Klersy C, Black A J, et al. In-stent restenosis:Long-term outcome and predictors of subsequent target lesion revascularization after repeat balloon angioplasty.J Am Coll Cardiol, 2000, 35 : 1569-- 1576.
  • 4Mehran R, Dangas G, Mintz G S, et al. Treatment of in-stent restenosis with excimer laser coronary angioplasty versus rotational atherectomy: Comparative mechanism and results. Circulation, 2000, 101 : 2484--2489.
  • 5Fischell T A, Drexler H. Pullback atherectomy (PAC)for the treatment of complex bifurcation coronary artery disease. Cat het Cardiovasc Diagn, 1996, 38 : 218 -- 221.
  • 6Drexler H, Fischell T. Initial clinical experience using a novel pullback atherectomy catheter (PAC) in the treatment of obstructive coronary artery disease. Circulation, 1995, 92:1--147.
  • 7Veinot J P, Ma X, Jelley J, et al. Preliminary clinical experience with the pullback atherectomy catheter and the study of proliferation in coronary plaques. Can J Cardiol, 1998, 14:1457--1463.
  • 8Mehran R, Dangas G, Abizaid A S, et al. Angiographic patterns of in-stent restenosis: Classification and implications for long-term outcome. Circulation, 1999,100 : 1872--1878.
  • 9Schiele F, Meneveau N, Seronde A, et al. Predictors of event-free survival after repeat intracoronary procedure for in-stent restenosis: Study with angiographic and in-travascular ultrasound imaging. Eur Heart J, 2000, 21:754-762.
  • 10Kwok O H, Prpic R, Kinlay S, et al. Quantitative angiographic outcome after intracoronary pullback atherectomy. Am J Cardiol, 2001, 87:1108--1110.

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部