期刊文献+

论简本《老子》与今本《老子》的关系

The Relation between Guo Dian Lao Tze and the traditional edetion Lao Tze
下载PDF
导出
摘要 从语言、思想、思维等方面证明今本《老子》比简本《老子》多出的部分不是老子散失的作品 ,而是传释《老子》的注本 ,并进而证明它的作者就是秦献公时期的太史儋。在此基础上 ,从“道”、“德”两个核心概念入手 ,进一步阐述今本《老子》作为疏传体例的注本的特点 ,求证了今本《老子》是如何传释《老子》的 ;最后评价太史儋的功过是非 ,肯定太史儋在发扬光大老子思想方面作出了很大贡献但同时也背离了老子思想 ,首开排斥异己之风 ,给中国文化带来了负面影响。 The relation between Guo Dian Lao Tze,the Bamboo strips and the traditional edition Lao Tze has been a hot talk in the field of Lao Tze research since the Bamboo Strips aritton by Lao Tze were discovered in Chu Tembs in Guo Dian.This paper,according to the Chinese cherecter ,thoughts and ideas of the Stips ,tries to prove that the pants,which appear in the traditional edition but are not found in the Strips ,are not the missing works by Lao Tze but the notes to Guo Dian Lao Tze ,the Strips,which were just written by Minister Tai Shi Dan living in the same times as Emperor Qin Xian Gong.A so the paper explains ,from natual rules and moral standards ,the reasons why and how the parts are said to be the notes to the strips ,In the end ,the paper analyses Miriston Tai Shi Dan ,who once played an important role in developing the thoughts of Lao Tze,but meanwhile he mistook or deviated from the thoughts of Lao Tze and excluded other thoughts and ideas,This has had a bad effect on the culture in China all the time.
作者 罗仲祥
机构地区 毕节师专政史系
出处 《毕节师范高等专科学校学报(综合版)》 2003年第2期80-88,共9页 Journal of Bijie Teachers College
关键词 简本《老子》 今本《老子》 关系 注本 老子思想 太史儋 Guo Dian Lao Tze Traditional edition Lao Tze Mioncstin Tai she Dan national rekes moral standards notes merits
  • 相关文献

参考文献1

  • 1罗仲祥.论老子的自然观[J]毕节师范高等专科学校学报(综合版),2000(02).

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部