期刊文献+

非霍奇金淋巴瘤282例临床分析 被引量:3

Clinical analysis of 282 patients with non-Hodgkin′s lymphoma
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的 :分析非霍奇金淋巴瘤 (NHL)的分型、分期及预后。方法 :对本院 2 82例非霍奇金淋巴瘤患者进行回顾性研究。结果 :B细胞性完全缓解率及五年生存率高于T细胞性 (P <0 .0 5 ) ,低度、中度、高度恶性非霍奇金淋巴瘤完全缓解率及五年生存率有显著差别 (P <0 .0 5 ) ,选择环磷酰胺、长春新碱、阿霉素、强的松 (CHOP)方案其完全缓解率及五年生存率高于环磷酰胺、长春新碱、足叶乙甙、强的松 (COP +VP1 6 )方案 (P <0 .0 5 )。结论 :合理分型、分期对非霍奇金淋巴瘤预后判断有重要临床意义。 Objective To analyze the classification, stage and prognosis of non Hodgkin′s lymphoma (NHL). Methods Two hundred eighty two patients with NHL were retrospectively reviewed. Results The complete remission (CR) rate and 5 year survival rate of B cell NHL were higher than those of T cell NHL( P <0.05). There were significant differences in CR rate and 5 year survival rate among the low grade, the intermediate grade and the high grade NHL( P <0.05). The CR rate and 5 year survival rate of patients who were treated by the scheme of doxorubicin, cyclophosphamide, vincristine and prednisone (CHOP) were higher than those treated by the scheme of cyclophosphamide, vincristine, prednisone and etoposide (COP+VP16) ( P <0.05). Conclusion Rational classification and staging play an important role in the prognosis of NHL. CHOP based scheme may be regarded as the first choice and the standard scheme of treatment.
出处 《湖南医科大学学报》 CSCD 北大核心 2003年第3期237-239,共3页 Bulletin of Hunan Medical University
关键词 非霍奇金淋巴瘤 临床分析 预后 环磷酰胺 长春新碱 阿霉素 强的松 lymphoma non Hodgkin's classification stage prognosis
  • 相关文献

参考文献10

  • 1全国淋巴瘤研究座谈会.各型淋巴瘤诊断标准[J].中华肿瘤杂志,1983,5:151-153.
  • 2潘启超 胥彬.我国实体肿瘤客观疗效评定标准[M].广州:广东高校出版社,1989.431.
  • 3石远凯.非霍奇金淋巴瘤临床治疗的新观点[J].白血病.淋巴瘤,2001,10(6):323-325. 被引量:6
  • 4刘开彦,陆道培.自体外周血造血干细胞移植治疗非霍奇金淋巴瘤182例临床分析[J].中华内科杂志,2002,41(6):363-366. 被引量:12
  • 5潘启超 胥彬.我国实体肿瘤客观疗效评定标准[S].广州:广东高校出版社,1989.431.
  • 6Non-Hodgkin "s lymphoma pathologic classification project. National cancer institute sponsored study of classification of Non-Hodgking lymphoma summary and description of a working formulation for clinical usage [J]. Cancer, 1982,49:2112.
  • 7Carbone PP, Kaplan HS, Lukes RJ, et al. Report of the committee on Hodgkin's disease staging classification [J]. Cancer Res,1971,31:1860.
  • 8Dumoutet C, Mounier N, Munck JN, et al. Factors predictive of early death in patients receiving hlgh-dose CHOP (ACVB regimen) for aggressive non-Hodgekin's lyphoma[J]. Br J Heamatol,2002, 118( 1 ) :210-217.
  • 9Hagemeister FB. Treatment of relapsed agreesive lymphomas: regimens with and without high-dose therapy and stem cell rescue[ J]. Cancer Chemother Pharmaeol, 2002, 49( suppl 1 ) :13-20.
  • 10Intragumtomchai T, Prayoonwiwat W, Numben .IT, et al. CHOP versus CHOP plus ESHAPO and high-dose therapy with autologous peripheral blood progenitor cell transplantation for high-inter-mediate-risk and high-risk aggressive Non-Hodgkin's lymphoma[J]. Clin Lymphoma, 2000,1:215-219.

二级参考文献7

  • 1Gratwohl A, Hermans J, Baldomero H. Blood and marrow transplantation activity in Europe 1995. European Group for Blood and Marrow Transplantation(EBMT). Bone Marrow Transplant,1997,19:407-419.
  • 2Schmitz N, Linch DC, Dreger P, et al. Randomised trial of filgrastim mobilized peripheral blood progenitor cell transplantation versus autologous bone marrow transplantation in lymphoma patients. Lancet,1996,347:353-357.
  • 3Teshima T, Harada M, Takamatsu Y, et al. Cytotoxic drug and cytotoxic drug/G-CSF mobilization of peripheral blood stem cells and their use for autografting . Bone Marrow Transplant, 1992, 10: 215-220.
  • 4Narayanasami U, Kanteti R, Morelli J, et al. Randomized trail of filgrastim versus chemotherapy and filgrastim mobilization of hematopoietic progenitor cells for rescue in autologous transplantation. Blood, 2001,98:2059-2064.
  • 5Intragumtornchai T, Prayoonwiwat W, Numben JT ,et al. CHOP versus CHOP plus ESHAP and high-dose therapy with autologous peripheral blood progenitou cell transplantation for high-intermediate-risk and high-risk aggressive non-Hodgkin′s lymphoma. Clin Lymphoma, 2000,1:219-225.
  • 6Gutierrez-Delgado F, Maloney DG, Press OW, et al. Autologous stem cell transplantation for non-Hodgkin′s lymphoma: comparison of radiation-based and chemotherapy-only preparative regimens. Bone Marrow Transplant, 2001,28:455-461.
  • 7Horning SJ,Chao NJ, Negrin RS, et al. High-dose therapy and autologous hematopoietic progenitor cell transplantation for recurrent or refractory Hodgkin′s disease: analysis of the Stanford University results and prognostic indices. Blood, 1997, 89:801-813.

共引文献18

同被引文献24

引证文献3

二级引证文献7

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部